Skip to content
New Morning Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New Morning Foundation

New Mornings mission is to transform healthcare in partnership with communities, providers, and patients to ensure that everyone can obtain high-quality sexual and reproductive health services.

$5.9M
Granted FY2017
25
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.2M
$71,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,711,268
WOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETW$800,000
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS$410,650
SC CAMPAIGN PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY$299,817
Individual grant recipient$215,954
NATL CAMPAIGN PREVENT TEEN PREGNAN$214,127
LITTLE RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC$175,834
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$140,863
GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEMS$134,193
HOPEHEALTH INC$106,210
FETTER HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC$95,325
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA PASOS$74,834
EAU CLAIR COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER$71,800
AFFINITY HEALTH CENTER$66,757
FAMILY SOLUTIONS OF THE LOW COUNTRY$63,804
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATL CAMPAIGN PREVENT TEEN PREGNAN: $214k → 14%WOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETW: $800k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
2
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
3
Health Care Partners of South Carolina Inc

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health
4
Southeast Community Health Systems

The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.

—
5
Regenesis Health Care Inc

We strive to give health services to residents in and around the spartanburg, cherokee, and union sc areas. we believe that services to families can make a difference in the community, helping neighbors move towards healthier lifestyles…

Health
6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Tandem Health Sc

Tandem health sc is a comprehensive primary healthcare practice dedicated to building a healthy community and improving the health, well-being, and quality of life of each person served.

Health
8
Palmetto Health Council Inc

Palmetto Health Council, Inc will be the model of excellence for improving the total health status of the communities it serves. All of our employees will provide comprehensive preventative, curative, and life-enhancing services in a…

Health
9
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
10
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
11
Genesis Healthcare Inc

To provide timely, affordable, compassionate, and quality primary and preventative medical, dental, and pharmaceutical services to South Carolina's economically and culturally diverse communities.

Health
12
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OBGYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fetter Health Care Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Power to Decide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,711,268 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $410,650 · OtherFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INCIndividual grant recipient: $215,954 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $140,863 · Other+10 more: $690,879 · Other+10 moreWOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $800,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS RIGHTS AND E…POWER TO DECIDE: $214,127 · Human ServicesPOWER TO DECIDELITTLE RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC: $175,834 · HealthHopehealth Inc: $106,210 · HealthAffinity Health Center: $66,757 · HealthCARESOUTH CAROLINA INC: $48,525 · HealthMCLEOD HEALTH: $40,500 · Health+2 more: $22,748 · HealthFACT FORWARD: $299,817 · EducationMidlands Fatherhood Coalition: $13,708 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,169,614Human Services$1,014,127Health$460,574Education$299,817Recreation & Sports$13,708

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMENS RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $800,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $410,650 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFACT FORWARD: $299,817 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPOWER TO DECIDE: $214,127 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLITTLE RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC: $175,834 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHopehealth Inc: $106,210 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFETTER HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC: $95,325 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COOPERATIVE HEALTH CENTER INC: $71,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAffinity Health Center: $66,757 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCARESOUTH CAROLINA INC: $48,525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JAMES HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $48,170 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMCLEOD HEALTH: $40,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSC Office of Rural Health Inc: $14,749 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMidlands Fatherhood Coalition: $13,708 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPrisma Health-Midlands: $7,999 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BlueCross BlueShield …Reach Out and Read IncChildren's Trust of S…The Duke EndowmentAmerican Cancer Socie…Fact ForwardThe Molina Healthcare…Central Carolina Comm…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina FoundationSC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · Children's Trust of South Carolina · The Duke Endowment · American Cancer Society Inc · Fact Forward · The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Morning Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Morning Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Morning’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home