Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

New Life Thrift Inc

The primary activity is the operation of two thrift stores.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$680kHuman Services$123kEducation$96kInternational$49kYouth Development$35kHealth$24kEmployment$20kCrime & Legal$14k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Life Presbyterian Church$25,000
New Life Nursery School$15,000
Helping India Together$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Every Good Gift: $15k → 7%Every Good Gift: $15k → 7%Every Good Gift: $15k → 7%Every Good Gift: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$960k · 10 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$960k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+41%

Still filing today

60%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $54k · revenue +84%
  • EG
    EVERY GOOD GIFT
    5× · 2019–2024 · $53k · revenue +94%
  • HI
    HELPING INDIA TOGETHER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • MT
    MENA Trauma Healing Resource
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • NL
    New Life Nursery School
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • AC
    Alpha Care
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living Hope Women's Centers

We empower christ's followers through a unique partnership opportunity to evangelize, provide services that protect the unborn, mentor students and parents, and heal the hurting.

Human Services
2
Christ Clinic

Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.

Health
3
Samaria Global Ministries

Religious and counselling

4
Christian Ministries International
5
Christian Immigration Advocacy Cent

Provide high-quality legal services in a compassionate, incarnational, and culturally-appropriate way and empower churches to serve their sojourner neighbors well through collaborative partnerships.

Human Services
6
Christ Life Ministries

Christ Life Ministries' vision is transforming lives for Christ through the preaching of the gospel and discipleship.

Religion
7
Puerto Esperanza Inc

To offer christ-centered hope, healing, and direction to women and children escaping domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Christian League for Battered Women

To provide emergency shelter, food, and counseling for victims of violence.

9
Options Now

To minister to women and their families needing care, support and resources due to pregnancy.

Health
10
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
11
Christian Services Inc

To provide support and assistance for missionaries, church and mission agencies, missionary children, and individuals in financial, physical or otherwise needy circumstances.

12
Alpha International Ministries

Ministry is a cristian church focusing on spreading the word of god, humanitarian help, reaching out to communities in need, provide financial help, build new churches.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping India Together and the most unlike its peers is Marinas Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW LIFE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GLENSIDE — $670,370 · OtherNEW LIFE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GLENSIDEMARINAS KIDS — $35,000 · Other+8 more — $89,400 · Other+8 moreEVERY GOOD GIFT — $53,000 · Human ServicesANAWEZA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $53,600 · EducationHELPING INDIA TOGETHER — $48,500 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentALPHA PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $18,000 · HealthTWIN STATE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING INC — $6,000 · HealthMARKET PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementCHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINICS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $6,700 · Crime & Legal
Other$794,770Human Services$63,000Education$53,600International$48,500Youth Development$30,000Health$24,000Community Improvement$20,000Crime & Legal$6,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $53,600 over 6y, 13% of budgetEVERY GOOD GIFT — $53,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetHELPING INDIA TOGETHER — $48,500 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARKET PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetALPHA PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $18,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetANAWEZA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINICS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $6,700 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTWIN STATE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCAMP ANDREWS — $5,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds EVERY GOOD GIFT
  • Who funds HELPING INDIA TOGETHER
  • Who funds MARINAS KIDS
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds MARKET PROJECT INC
  • Who funds ALPHA PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ANAWEZA INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINICS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
  • Who funds TWIN STATE CHRISTIAN COUNSELING INC
  • Who funds CAMP ANDREWS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Life Thrift Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Life Thrift Inc?

    Find your warmest path to New Life Thrift Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph