Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

New Kingston Animal Sanctuary

Housing, feeding and protection of wildlife (animals)

$507k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Animals$1.5MHuman Services$55k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $473,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $506,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $33,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOI DOG FOUNDATION USA$100,000
TIBETAN MASTIFF RESCUE INC$50,000
ODD MAN INN ANIMAL REFUGE$40,000
SISU REFUGE$40,000
IOWA ANIMAL FARM SANCTUARY$30,000
CRITTER CREEK FARM SANCTUARY$30,000
ARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION$30,000
FREEDOM FARM$30,000
THE BLIND SPOT SANCTUARY INC$28,000
VEGAN OUTREACH$25,000
WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC$25,000
HANDS TO PAWS$20,000
K9AID INC$12,000
PIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE$7,000
SUNNYSIDE STREET DOGS INC$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FREEDOM FARM: $30k → 5%LANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FREEDOM FARM: $25k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
IA
CT
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of New Kingston Animal Sanctuary’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

New Kingston Animal Sanctuarylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$1.4M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TIBETAN MASTIFF RESCUE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $144k · revenue +25% · 34% of their budget
  • KH
    KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $132k · revenue +69%
  • TB
    THE BLIND SPOT ANIMAL SANCTUARY IN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $87k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +43%
  • AA
    ANIMALS ASIA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu
Animals
2
Paws Claws Exotics

A sanctuary for unfortunate animals

—
3
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
Spring Farm Sanctuary
Animals
6
Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary
Animals
7
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
8
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
9
Karma Farm Sanctuary Inc
Animals
10
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
11
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
12
Raskels Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sunnyside Street Dogs I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIBETAN MASTIFF RESCUE INC — $143,500 · AnimalsTIBETAN MASTIFF RESCUE INCKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE — $131,500 · AnimalsKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUEODD MAN INN ANIMAL REFUGE — $100,000 · AnimalsODD MAN INN ANIMAL REFUGETHE BLIND SPOT ANIMAL SANCTUARY IN — $87,000 · AnimalsTHE BLIND SPOT ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCRITTER CREEK FARM SANCTUARY INC — $82,500 · AnimalsCRITTER CREEK FARM SANCTUARY INCAnimal Place — $62,500 · AnimalsAnimal PlaceIOWA FARM SANCTUARY — $61,000 · AnimalsIOWA FARM SANCTUARYARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION — $60,000 · AnimalsARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATIONWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $50,000 · AnimalsHANDS TO PAWS INC — $44,000 · AnimalsSUNNYSIDE STREET DOGS I — $42,075 · AnimalsK9AID INC — $37,400 · Animals+9 more — $137,150 · Animals+9 moreSoi Dog Foundation USA — $300,000 · PhilanthropySoi Dog Foundation US…SISU REFUGE — $86,500 · OtherANIMALS ASIA — $20,000 · OtherVEGAN OUTREACH INC — $62,500 · Food & NutritionFreedom Farm — $55,000 · Human ServicesLANGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human Services
Animals$1,038,625Philanthropy$300,000Other$106,500Food & Nutrition$62,500Human Services$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSoi Dog Foundation USA — $300,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTIBETAN MASTIFF RESCUE INC — $143,500 over 4y, 34% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE — $131,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetODD MAN INN ANIMAL REFUGE — $100,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BLIND SPOT ANIMAL SANCTUARY IN — $87,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSISU REFUGE — $86,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCRITTER CREEK FARM SANCTUARY INC — $82,500 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetAnimal Place — $62,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC — $62,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetIOWA FARM SANCTUARY — $61,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION — $60,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFreedom Farm — $55,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHANDS TO PAWS INC — $44,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSUNNYSIDE STREET DOGS I — $42,075 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetK9AID INC — $37,400 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $25,450 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPET ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF CONNECTICUT INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE — $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Art for Animals Found…Paypal Charitable Giv…Chubb Charitable Foun…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…
Art for Animals FoundationNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Art for Animals Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Kingston Animal Sanctuary funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Kingston Animal Sanctuary?

    Find your warmest path to New Kingston Animal Sanctuary through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home