Skip to content
New Georgia Project Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New Georgia Project Inc

The mission of new georgia project is to build power and increase the civic participation of the new georgia majority and other historically marginalized communities through nonpartisan voter registration, organizing, and advocacy on the issues important to our communities.

$926k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.1MCivil Rights$821kArts & Culture$723kPublic Benefit$510kHuman Services$384kYouth Development$135kHealth$97kReligion$53k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $426k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$250,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMPHIS ARTISTS FOR CHANGE$250,000
FAITH IN ACTION FL$250,000
POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY & JUSTIC$215,797
ONE VOICE$210,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE VOICE: $210k → 13%ONE VOICE: $174k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
VA
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 6 repeat orgs$842k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$3.0M
$842k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitArts & CultureHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FAITH IN FLORIDA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $723k · revenue +19%
  • PC
    POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $689k · revenue +760%
  • OO
    OPERATION ONE VOICE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $384k · revenue +9% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • NG
    NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $427k · revenue 0%
  • GF
    GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $97k · revenue -11%
  • BM
    BLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $68k · revenue +461%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
2
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
3
Transforming Georgia Inc

Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.

Civil Rights
4
Fair Fight Action Inc

Fair fight action promotes fair elections in georgia and around the country, encourages voter participation in elections, educates voters about elections and their voting rights, and advocates for progressive issues.

Education
5
Black Male Initiative Fund Inc

The black male initiative georgia seeks to create and promote the positive narrative about black men in our homes, communities & abroad by highlighting the outstanding work of black men. bmiga is committed to advocating for & advancing…

Civil Rights
6
Black in Action Collective

Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities

Civil Rights
7
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services
8
Black Feminist Future Inc

The Organization is a political hub focused on the dynamic possibilities of galvanizing the social and political power of Black women, girls, and gender-expansive people towards liberation.

Arts & Culture
9
Faith in Indiana

Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…

Human Services
10
Black Appalachian Coalition

Black Appalachian Coalition (BLAC), a multi-state organization working across Appalachia and the Ohio River Valley and Basin, is centered on story-based approaches that amplify Black voices, fights for environmental justice and strengthens…

Civil Rights
11
Latino Community Fund Inc

The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…

Philanthropy
12
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Georgia Project Action Fund; the most unlike its peers is Restoreher Usamerica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH IN FLORIDA INC: $723,000 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN FLORIDA INCFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $372,734 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN ACTION NETWORKFAIR COUNT INC: $55,000 · Community ImprovementPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE: $688,797 · Civil RightsPOWER COALITION FOR EQUI…BLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INC: $67,500 · Civil RightsBLACK MALE INITIATIVE GE…RESTOREHER USAMERICA INC: $45,000 · Civil RightsRESTOREHER USAMERICA INC+1 more: $20,000 · Civil RightsMemphis Artists for Change: $723,000 · Arts & CultureMemphis Artists for C…NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND: $427,073 · OtherNEW GEORGIA PROJEC…Black Man Lab Foundation: $135,000 · OtherBlack Man Lab Foun…FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO: $52,500 · OtherFAITH IN TEXAS - P…ADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC: $25,000 · OtherOPERATION ONE VOICE INC: $384,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION O…GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC: $97,000 · HealthCommunity Movement Builders Inc: $50,000 · Public BenefitProgressive Change Institute: $2,900 · Public Benefit
Community Improvement$1,150,734Civil Rights$821,297Arts & Culture$723,000Other$639,573Human Services$384,000Health$97,000Public Benefit$52,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAITH IN FLORIDA INC: $723,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetMemphis Artists for Change: $723,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE: $688,797 over 4y, 13% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND: $427,073 over 1y, 12% of budgetOPERATION ONE VOICE INC: $384,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $372,734 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBlack Man Lab Foundation: $135,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetGEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC: $97,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetFAIR COUNT INC: $55,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetFAITH IN TEXAS - PICO: $52,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCommunity Movement Builders Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetProgressive Change Institute: $2,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundThe Community Foundat…Silicon Valley Commun…United Way of Greater…Borealis PhilanthropyCommon Counsel Founda…NEO Philanthropy IncThe Ford FoundationFaith in Action Netwo…Proteus Fund Inc
Tides FoundationCA22.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Ford Foundation · Faith in Action Network · Proteus Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Georgia Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Georgia Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Georgia Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to New Georgia Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Georgia Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home