· Public charity
New Georgia Project Inc
The mission of new georgia project is to build power and increase the civic participation of the new georgia majority and other historically marginalized communities through nonpartisan voter registration, organizing, and advocacy on the issues important to our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k2 grants · $426k
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEMPHIS ARTISTS FOR CHANGE | $250,000 |
| FAITH IN ACTION FL | $250,000 |
| POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY & JUSTIC | $215,797 |
| ONE VOICE | $210,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FIFAITH IN FLORIDA INC4× · 2021–2024 · $723k · revenue +19%
- PCPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE4× · 2021–2024 · $689k · revenue +760%
- OOOPERATION ONE VOICE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $384k · revenue +9% · 42% of their budget
Funded once
- NGNEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUNDone grant, 2021 · $427k · revenue 0%
- GFGEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INCone grant, 2021 · $97k · revenue -11%
- BMBLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $68k · revenue +461%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
Fair fight action promotes fair elections in georgia and around the country, encourages voter participation in elections, educates voters about elections and their voting rights, and advocates for progressive issues.
The black male initiative georgia seeks to create and promote the positive narrative about black men in our homes, communities & abroad by highlighting the outstanding work of black men. bmiga is committed to advocating for & advancing…
Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
The Organization is a political hub focused on the dynamic possibilities of galvanizing the social and political power of Black women, girls, and gender-expansive people towards liberation.
Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…
Black Appalachian Coalition (BLAC), a multi-state organization working across Appalachia and the Ohio River Valley and Basin, is centered on story-based approaches that amplify Black voices, fights for environmental justice and strengthens…
The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…
Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Georgia Project Action Fund and the most unlike its peers is Restoreher Usamerica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAITH IN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Memphis Artists for Change ↗
- Who funds POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ONE VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Black Man Lab Foundation ↗
- Who funds GEORGIANS FOR A HEALTHY FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds FAIR COUNT INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO ↗
- Who funds Community Movement Builders Inc ↗
- Who funds RESTOREHER USAMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds Progressive Change Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Ford Foundation · Faith in Action Network · Proteus Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Georgia Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Georgia Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to New Georgia Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.