· Private foundation
New Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH WOODBURY COUNTY | $5,960 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH WEBSTER COUNTY | $5,440 |
| NEWARKCOLFAX TOWNSHIP FIREBOARD | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HANCOCK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $5,000 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH PLYMOUTH COUNTY | $4,880 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH SAC COUNTY | $4,480 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH PAGE COUNTY | $4,140 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH CERRO GORDO COUNTY | $4,100 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH KOSSUTH COUNTY | $4,100 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH HAMILTON COUNTY | $3,760 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH HANCOCK COUNTY | $3,760 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH CLAY COUNTY | $3,700 |
| ISU EXTENSION & OUTREACH GREENE COUNTY | $3,640 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
200 repeat relationships: 124 still active in FY2025, 76 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTH CENTRAL IOWA AG IN THE CLASSROOM3× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +28%
- ICIOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +61%
- IGIOWA GARDENING FOR GOOD4× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +267%
Funded once
- WCWEBTER CITY CUSTOM MEATS INCone grant, 2020 · $29k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $13k
- BBBACKPACK BUDDIESone grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a county fair for rural iowa
Raise funds to support the dallas county fair association; provide fundraising efforts to improve the infrastructure and programming provided to the residents of dallas county iowa.
Promote & hold agricultural, horticultural, young, women's, mechanical arts, industrial and commercial projects, fairs and expositions.
To provide a youth achievement show.
To produce the annual fair, incorporate youth shows and agriculture along with educational, competitive and recreational opportunities for the county we represent.
To support agriculture education and development for youths in lee county, iowa.
To provide an annual agricultural fair for the youth of marshall county
County fair to exhibit to the public cattle and livestock shows, 4-h exhibits and commercial activities of the residents of ringgold county, iowa.
4-h/ffa fair
To provide entertainment and food at the four county fair in dunlap, ia.
How this is measured
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 657 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation · First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Missouri River Historical Development Inc · Home State Bank Charitable Foundation · Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization New Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to New Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on New’s filings →