Skip to content
Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$888k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Housing & Shelter$850kHealth$444kAnimals$200kHuman Services$120kYouth Development$100kEducation$30kCommunity Improvement$16kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $403k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION NEW HOPE$400,000
THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARING$202,500
JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$100,000
MALIVAI WASHINGTON KIDS FOUNDATION$50,000
I M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC$50,000
BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC$20,000
BROOKS HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
RIVERSIDE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC$15,000
MORNING STAR SCHOOL$15,000
NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $20k → 6%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $15k → 12%BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $20k → 6%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$514k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +174% since the first grant, against +156% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+174%
+156%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    Operation New Hope Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $800k · revenue +230%
  • JZ
    JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +158%
  • MW
    MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR
    one grant, 2017 · $201k
  • IM
    I M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
2
New Hope of Indiana Inc

New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.

—
3
Making It Possible to End Homelessness Inc

The organization's mission is to increase local services and resources for the homeless. miph provides affordable permanent housing in central new jersey, giving families a stable place to live while they prepare for their lives free from…

Housing & Shelter
4
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
5
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
6
Nicholas House Inc

Nicholas house's mission is to help families experiencing homelessness become self-sufficient by providing them with stable housing while addressing the root causes of their homelessness so that they never become homeless again.

Housing & Shelter
7
90 Works Inc

Overcoming homelessness, poverty, and family violence by becoming self-sufficient

—
8
New Horizons Rehabilitation Services Inc

Investing in our communities by providing employment opportunities for indviduals facing barriers to employment.

—
9
Family Support Services of Suncoast

To be the leader in providing safety, stability, and quality of life for all children by working with the community to strengthen the family unit.

Human Services
10
The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and creating holistic paths to employment so that individuals and families can secure safe, clean,…

Human Services
11
Hope House Day Care Center Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide supportive social services to children and individuals affected by hiv and poverty in order to enhance the quality of their lives. the mission is to improve the quality of life for individuals…

Human Services
12
House of Hope Inc

To provide licensed substance use and mental health disorder treatment to those affected by substance and mental health issues.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Family Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bright Holidays Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Operation New Hope Inc: $800,000 · Housing & ShelterOperation New Hope IncIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INCTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARING: $202,500 · OtherTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARI…THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR: $201,000 · OtherTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FORI M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE: $50,000 · OtherI M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THEMORNING STAR SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherMORNING STAR SCHOOL+1 more: $16,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $200,000 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE…MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsBRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE GENESIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Education
Housing & Shelter$850,000Other$499,500Animals$200,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Human Services$70,000Health$40,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOperation New Hope Inc: $800,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Neviaser Foundati…Jacksonville Jaguars …The Community Foundat…The Jim Moran Foundat…Pga Tour IncVyStar Credit UnionStellar FoundationThe Gate Foundation I…United Way of Northea…Blue Cross Blue Shiel…The Blackbaud Giving …Publix Super Markets …
The Neviaser FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Neviaser Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · VyStar Credit Union · Stellar Foundation · The Gate Foundation Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Operation New Hope Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Cathedral Arts Project Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neviaser’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home