· Private foundation
The Neviaser Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $875k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOSH (MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & HISTORY) | $200,000 |
| COMMUNITY HOSPICE OF NORTHEAST FL | $200,000 |
| OPERATION NEW HOPE | $200,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC | $100,000 |
| MAINSPRING ACADEMY INC | $75,000 |
| MALIVAI WASHINGTON KIDS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| DANIEL FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| RIVERSIDE ROTARY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOUSING CRISIS CENTER | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $928k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ONOperation New Hope Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +242%
- CHCOMMUNITY HOSPICE OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA4× · 2022–2025 · $800k · revenue +14%
- JZJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $552k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- CHCommuntiy Hospice of NE Floridaone grant, 2021 · $200k
- GRGENESIS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +10%
- FNFeeding Northeast Floridaone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance health and well-being of persons requiring rehabilitation through superior outcomes, service, education and research.
The organization's mission is to provide pro bono guardianship services and care management to indigent individuals with disabling conditions.
To provide quality primary health care services, accessible to all persons in pierson, deland, daytona, and deltona, florida, by promoting individual health wellness services, education, and resources. we are dedicated to providing quality…
To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.
To develop sustainable housing, finance new homebuyers, educate current and prospective homebuyers
Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.
To empower individuals of all ages and abilities and their families through comprehensive intervention and disability services promoting growth and belonging.
The organization was organized and exists for the purpose of soliciting and managing the charitable contributions soley for the use in funding the operations, capital expenditures and special programs of community hospice of northeast…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
Identify and provide 24-hour care to gifted and high intelligence teens in Floridas foster care system.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The Organization's mission is to empower families in making their transition from homelessness to sustainable independence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Family Inc and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Rotary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Operation New Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DANIEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAINSPRING ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds St Augustine Society Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GENESIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GENESIS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · The Gate Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Charities Inc · Stellar Foundation · Dubow Family Foundation Inc · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · The Thomas M and Irene Kirbo Charitable Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Neviaser Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
- Cathedral Arts Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Genesis Rehabilitation Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.