Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$888k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Housing & Shelter$850kHealth$444kAnimals$200kHuman Services$120kYouth Development$100kEducation$30kCommunity Improvement$16kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $403k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION NEW HOPE$400,000
THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARING$202,500
JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$100,000
MALIVAI WASHINGTON KIDS FOUNDATION$50,000
I M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC$50,000
BROOKS HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC$20,000
NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY$15,000
RIVERSIDE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC$15,000
MORNING STAR SCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $20k → 6%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $15k → 12%BRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC: $20k → 6%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$514k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +174% since the first grant, against +156% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+174%
+156%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    Operation New Hope Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $800k · revenue +230%
  • JZ
    JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +100%
  • MW
    MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR
    one grant, 2017 · $201k
  • IM
    I M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +156%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
2
New Hope of Indiana Inc

New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.

3
Making It Possible to End Homelessness Inc

The organization's mission is to increase local services and resources for the homeless. miph provides affordable permanent housing in central new jersey, giving families a stable place to live while they prepare for their lives free from…

Housing & Shelter
4
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

5
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
6
Nicholas House Inc

Nicholas house's mission is to help families experiencing homelessness become self-sufficient by providing them with stable housing while addressing the root causes of their homelessness so that they never become homeless again.

Housing & Shelter
7
90 Works Inc

Overcoming homelessness, poverty, and family violence by becoming self-sufficient

8
New Horizons Rehabilitation Services Inc

Investing in our communities by providing employment opportunities for indviduals facing barriers to employment.

9
Family Support Services of Suncoast

To be the leader in providing safety, stability, and quality of life for all children by working with the community to strengthen the family unit.

Human Services
10
The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and creating holistic paths to employment so that individuals and families can secure safe, clean,…

Human Services
11
Hope House Day Care Center Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide supportive social services to children and individuals affected by hiv and poverty in order to enhance the quality of their lives. the mission is to improve the quality of life for individuals…

Human Services
12
House of Hope Inc

To provide licensed substance use and mental health disorder treatment to those affected by substance and mental health issues.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Family Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bright Holidays Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Operation New Hope Inc — $800,000 · Housing & ShelterOperation New Hope IncIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INCTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARING — $202,500 · OtherTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR CARI…THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FOR — $201,000 · OtherTHE HOSPICE FOUNDATION FORI M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE — $50,000 · OtherI M SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THEMORNING STAR SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherMORNING STAR SCHOOL+1 more — $16,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $200,000 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE…MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsBRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE GENESIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · HealthCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Education
Housing & Shelter$850,000Other$499,500Animals$200,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Human Services$70,000Health$40,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOperation New Hope Inc — $800,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHT HOLIDAYS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Neviaser FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Neviaser Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · VyStar Credit Union · Stellar Foundation · The Gate Foundation Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc23% of income from government
  • Operation New Hope Inc13% of income from government
  • Cathedral Arts Project Inc1% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph