· Public charity
Nevada Bar Foundation
The NEVADA BAR FOUNDATION (the foundation) was formed to promote/provide law related education to members of the public, develop/improve legal education, engage in research in the field of law and legal practice, assist qualified individuals in the study of law, and to fund the charitable and tax exempt activities of the state bar as…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $518k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $260k
- $250k+5 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEGAL AID CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA | $6,465,600 |
| NORTHERN NEVADA LEGAL AID | $1,776,300 |
| NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES | $1,656,000 |
| SOUTHERN NEVADA SENIOR LAW PROGRAM | $922,800 |
| VOLUNTEER ATTORNEYS FOR RURAL NV | $683,300 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN INNOCENCE CENTER | $100,000 |
| NEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP | $55,000 |
| NORTHEAST NEVADA SAFE | $55,000 |
| SAFE NEST | $50,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF RURAL NV | $40,000 |
| CENTER OF ACCESS TO QDROS | $40,000 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER | $40,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NV | $35,500 |
| IMMIGRATION HOME FOUNDATION | $35,500 |
| NEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALEGAL AID CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA4× · 2020–2024 · $14M · revenue +93%
- NLNEVADA LEGAL SERVICES INC4× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +42%
- SNSouthern Nevada Senior Law Program5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +117% · 43% of their budget
Funded once
- CACASA ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- CCCLARK COUNTY LAW FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -1%
- CFCASA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nevada bar foundation (the foundation) was formed to promote/provide law related education to members of the public, develop/improve legal education, engage in research in the field of law and legal practice, assist qualified…
Community Service and Education The Nevada Alliance for Latino Education & Justice works to increase the civic engagement and leadership skills of low-income, urban youth and adults through
Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.
To uplift the indigenous community by building political power.
Partner to provide tools to grow financial capability in nv
The american civil liberties union incprotects and defends the civil liberties of all persons in nevada as provided by the united states constitution and bill of rights, as well as federal and state laws.
Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. was created to involve the public in the fight against crime. Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. provides citizens with a vehicle to anonymously supply Law Enforcement with information about a crime or wanted…
To provide the court with objective information regarding the status of children involved in abuse or neglect cases. Duties of the appointed advocate would include gathering information, developing recommendations, and providing written…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nevada Legal Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Nevada Judges Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 8. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 36% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Nevada Senior Law Program ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER ATTORNEYS FOR RURAL NEVADANS ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Innocence Center ↗
- Who funds NEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CARSON CITY ↗
- Who funds The Immigrant Home Foundation ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF RURAL NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Nevada SAFE ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN NEVADA CASA ↗
- Who funds SAFE NEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Project REAL ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds NEVADA INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC NURSING ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ACCESS TO QDROS ↗
- Who funds Our Nevada Judges Inc ↗
- Who funds WASHOE CASA FOUNDATION FKA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds KAIROS RECOVERY & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER INC FOU ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ASIAN BAR ASSOCIATION OF LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
- Who funds Andale Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NO TO ABUSE-NEVADA OUTREACH NEVADA OUTREACH TRAINING ORGANIZATI ↗
- Who funds NEVADA CENTER FOR CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds Nevada Latino Bar Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · America's Charities · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nevada Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.