Skip to content

· Private foundation

Neurotech Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$22kReligion$19kHealth$15kArts & Culture$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kInternational$1kCrime & Legal$1kHousing & Shelter$146
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
$1,275
Median grant
4
States reached
$311
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH$39,300
CADWELL INDUSTRIES INC$11,550
Individual grant recipient$1,275
SOLES FOR JESUS$1,000
LOVE GREATER THAN HATE PROJECT$500
Individual grant recipient$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 13%SOLES FOR JESUS: $1k → 17%SOLES FOR JESUS: $1k → 17%SOLES FOR JESUS: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
SD
IA
VA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Neurotech Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 8%.

Neurotech Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 5 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$10k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k
  • RA
    Redeem and Restore Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +7%
  • SF
    SOLES FOR JESUS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HH
    HELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue 0%
  • NV
    NEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH OF LAREDO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • NV
    NEW VISION CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Restored Hope Ministries Inc

Ministering to victims of sex-trafficking.

Human Services
2
John M Perkins Foundation for Reconciliation and Development Inc

Provide Christian Support

Religion
3
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
4
Cgh Health Foundation

Pursuing healthier lives for the people of the Sauk Valley.

—
5
Sojourner Recovery Services Inc

Sojourner is committed to be the provider of choice for individuals, families, and communities in need of substance abuse and mental health services. Through comprehensive, evidence-based practices and individualized services, we empower…

—
6
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
7
Scarlet Rope Project

The Scarlet Rope Project exists to provide a safe place for healing and restoration to survivors of sex trafficking.

Human Services
8
Redeeming Love Ministries

To partner with other organizations to spread the gospel message of Jesus Christ through education, feeding, and medical support of the indigent/orphaned children of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Youth Development
9
Vancouver St Vincent DePaul Society Conference

Inspired by the Gospel values of charity and compassion for all, and in an effort to promote human dignity, the Vancouver Conference of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul provides food, clothing, shelter and other forms of assistance to…

—
10
The Refuge a Religious Association

Christian outreach and resource center serving individuals with substance use disorder.

Religion
11
Girls Hope Rescue Mission

To rescue Kenyan Girls from GBV

Human Services
12
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hands Charitable Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is L Anse Creuse Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $39,300 · OtherNEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH INCCADWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $11,550 · OtherCADWELL INDUSTRIES INCNEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH OF LAREDO INC: $10,000 · OtherNEW VISION COMMUNITY CHURCH OF LAREDO INCNEW VISION CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherNEW VISION CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $4,019 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,283 · Other+11 more: $12,660 · Other+11 moreHELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS CHARI…SOLES FOR JESUS: $2,200 · Human ServicesSOLES FOR JESUSDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthRedeem and Restore Center Inc: $2,534 · HealthAvera Health: $1,000 · HealthLOVE GREATER THAN HATE PROJECT: $1,500 · Crime & LegalREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC: $146 · Housing & Shelter
Other$85,812Human Services$19,700Health$8,534Crime & Legal$1,500Housing & Shelter$146

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRedeem and Restore Center Inc: $2,534 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOLES FOR JESUS: $2,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetL Anse Creuse Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetLOVE GREATER THAN HATE PROJECT: $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAvera Health: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC: $146 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Redeem and Restore Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOLES FOR JESUS ↗
  • Who funds L Anse Creuse Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOVE GREATER THAN HATE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Avera Health ↗
  • Who funds REPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neurotech Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neurotech Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Neurotech Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Neurotech Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neurotech’s filings →

    More from the funding graph