· Charitable trust
Neubauer Family Charitable Trust
To make grants in support of charitable and educational activities
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $572k
- $250k+5 grants · $9.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Calder Gardens | $4,500,000 |
| University of Chicago | $3,223,417 |
| Tufts University | $910,000 |
| American Friends of the Hebrew University Inc | $315,000 |
| Cobbs Creek Restoration and Community Foundation | $300,000 |
| American Friends of The Tel Aviv University Inc | $141,920 |
| Saint Josephs University | $125,000 |
| Pennsylvania Horticultural Society | $100,000 |
| Black Male Community Council of Philadelphia | $80,000 |
| Temple University | $74,980 |
| Parkway Council Foundation | $50,000 |
| American Society of the University of Haifa | $49,000 |
| Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania | $46,450 |
| Foundations Inc | $44,640 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $604k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $749k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago7× · 2018–2024 · $36M · revenue +52%- TOTRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS2× · 2023–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +286%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +20%
Funded once
- SNSHED NYC INCone grant, 2019 · $1.7M · revenue -68%
- CRCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +28%
- PSPHILADELPHIA SOCCER 2026graduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +276%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Academies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Youth Volunteer Corps of Greater Philadelphia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ACADEMY OF SCHOOL LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds WHYY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
- Who funds SHED NYC INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
- Who funds LV PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP WLVT-TV CHANNEL 39 ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds TNTP INC ↗
- Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds ARTISTYEAR ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TEACH PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds THE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF GREATER PHILA ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CURATORIAL LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA SOCCER 2026 ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR POLICING INNOVATION AND REFORM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Neubauer Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Philadelphia Works Inc · Elevate 215 · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neubauer Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Neubauer Family Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Neubauer Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.