Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$144kHuman Services$71kEducation$47kFood & Nutrition$41kReligion$31kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$13k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEXTSTOP THEATRE COMPANY$20,000
ALL AGES READ TOGETHER$10,000
HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC$10,000
FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS$7,000
HERNDON VILLAGE NETWORK$6,000
ST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,000
FAIRFAX SYMPHONY ORCHRESTRA$3,000
THE FAIRFAX BALLET COMPANY$2,500
HERNDON WOMAN'S CLUB$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $10k → 6%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $10k → 6%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $10k → 6%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $10k → 6%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $10k → 6%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $5k → 6%ASSOCIATES OF ST JOHN BOSCO INC: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 13 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$373k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+354%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Herndon-Reston FISH Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +16%
  • AA
    All Ages Read Together
    6× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +84%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +305%

Funded once

  • HS
    HERNDON SENIOR CENTER COUNCIL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AO
    Associates of St John Bosco Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +354%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
2
District of Columbia Arts Center

The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…

Arts & Culture
3
Rosslyn Children's Center

Educators and families work in partnership to provide a joyful environment where children are encouraged to explore and interact with the world around them.

Education
4
Norfolk Arts Center

Bringing people and The Arts together.

Arts & Culture
5
Ann Arbor Symphony Orchestra Inc

To nuture a life-long love of music through imaginative and inspiring experiences for the listeners of today and tomorrow.

—
6
Salt Marsh Opera Company

To stage the finest professional opera productions in Southeastern New England. To excite and build audiences for the enjoyment of a grand art form. To offer educational programs and creative community outreach events that expand the opera…

Arts & Culture
7
222 Healdsburg Performing Arts

Create outstanding events and experiences in the performing arts as a prime dynamic of connection within our community. Recognize and encourage youth participation in the arts as an investment in our long term cultural vitality. Strengthen…

Arts & Culture
8
Buckham Fine Arts Project

Enrich cultural life of the community

—
9
Shaker Bridge Theatre Inc

To foster and support the performing arts in the upper valley and lakes region of new hampshire

Arts & Culture
10
Maryland Opera Inc

The mission of maryland opera, inc is (1) the promotion, production and performance in a variety of venues, of live opera experiences to audiences of all ages and backgrounds, (11) the creation and continuation of opera education and…

Philanthropy
11
Asheville Symphony Society Inc

The Asheville Symphony Orchestra performs and promotes symphonic music for the benefit, enjoyment and education of the people of Western North Carolina.

Arts & Culture
12
Springfield Ballet Company

None

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is The Fairfax Ballet Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEXTSTOP THEATRE COMPANY: $95,000 · OtherNEXTSTOP THEATRE COMPANYST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $31,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCHHERNDON VILLAGE NETWORK: $30,000 · OtherHERNDON VILLAGE NETWORKHERNDON WOMAN'S CLUB: $15,000 · OtherHERNDON WOMAN'S CLUBARTS HERNDON INC: $15,000 · OtherARTS HERNDON INC+1 more: $1,200 · OtherHerndon-Reston FISH Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesHerndon-Reston F…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesAll Ages Read Together: $45,500 · EducationAll Ages Read…FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $40,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR NEI…Fairfax Symphony Orchestra: $16,000 · Arts & CultureFairfax Sy…THE FAIRFAX BALLET COMPANY: $13,480 · Arts & CultureTHE FAIRFA…WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $4,500 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP …HOPE IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $7,500 · HealthINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $5,000 · Health
Other$187,200Human Services$56,000Education$45,500Food & Nutrition$40,500Arts & Culture$33,980Health$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHerndon-Reston FISH Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAll Ages Read Together: $45,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetFOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $40,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetFairfax Symphony Orchestra: $16,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetARTS HERNDON INC: $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE FAIRFAX BALLET COMPANY: $13,480 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHOPE IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $7,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Herndon-Reston FISH Inc ↗
  • Who funds All Ages Read Together ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds Fairfax Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds ARTS HERNDON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRFAX BALLET COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Associates of St John Bosco Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area IncVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Latino Economic Development Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nelson J & Katherine Friant Post’s filings →

    More from the funding graph