Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nelson Family Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$272kInternational$20kHealth$11kEducation$9kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$491k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Central Baptist Church$36,262
Voice of the Martyrs$2,000
UCA Foundation$1,000
Stride for a Cure$1,000
University of Texas$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Olive Tree Ministries: $10k → 11%Biblical Discipleship Ministries: $5k → 5%Lamb and Lion Ministries: $5k → 5%Andy Woods Ministries: $10k → 8%University of Texas: $500 → 10%Voice of the Martyrs: $7k → 14%University of Arkansas Foundation: $2k → 14%Chi Alpha: $1k → 15%Central Baptist Church: $36k → 17%Cru Foundation: $4k → 13%Texas Corners Bible Church: $5k → 12%Theology in Perspective: $5k → 16%Pre Trib Research Center: $7k → 15%The Joshua Fund: $8k → 9%Baptist Bible Hour: $8k → 16%Take A Stand Ministries: $12k → 9%Not By Works: $8k → 9%Lamb and Lion Ministries: $2k → 5%Andy Woods Ministries: $3k → 8%Voice of the Martyrs: $5k → 14%Chi Alpha: $520 → 15%Central Baptist Church: $34k → 17%Cru Foundation: $1k → 13%Theology in Perspective: $3k → 16%Joshua Fund: $5k → 9%Take A Stand Ministries: $4k → 9%Not By Works: $3k → 9%Andy Woods Ministries: $3k → 8%Voice of the Martyrs: $3k → 14%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%Central Baptist Church: $21k → 17%Theology in Perspective: $3k → 16%Behold Israel: $3k → 9%Voice of the Martyrs: $2k → 14%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%Arkansas Baptist Childrens Home: $1k → 17%The Joshua Fund: $2k → 9%Voice of the Martyrs: $2k → 14%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%UCA Foundation: $1k → 15%Beta Alpha Psi: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
AR
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Nelson Family Charitable Tr’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nelson Family Charitable Trlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 14 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$258k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+5%

Still filing today

29%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ANDY WOODS MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $16k · revenue +263%
  • TJ
    THE JOSHUA FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +133%
  • AT
    ACCORDING TO PROPHECY MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • OT
    OLIVE TREE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -25%
  • WV
    World View Weekend Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
2
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
3
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
4
Elijah List Ministries Inc

A religous organization performing charitable acts and teachings related to the bible.

Religion
5
Docusen Ministries

Preaching, teaching, writing and traveling ministry for the docusen family to serve christian churches and organizations.

Religion
6
Messiah for Israel Ministries Inc

The ministry is organized for the following purposes: (1)to minister to the Jewish people and educate them as to the Christian faith and their place in it according to the Bible; (2) to minister to other non-Christians and educate them as…

Religion
7
Plain Truth Ministries Worldwide

Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org

Religion
8
Rob White Ministries Inc

Making disciples of jesus christ through the testifying, sharing and teaching of the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
9
Arbo Ministries

To nbsp;spread nbsp;the nbsp;gospel nbsp;of nbsp;jesus nbsp;christ

—
10
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
11
Manny Arango Ministries Inc

Promote Gods word through understanding the Bible

Religion
12
Dean Bible Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ through sound teachings of the bible.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ariel Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Lamb & Lion Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $90,863 · OtherCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCHJohn Ankerberg Show: $30,000 · OtherJohn Ankerberg ShowFRIENDS OF ISRAEL GOSPEL MINISTRY INC: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL GOSPEL MINISTRY INCVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $19,000 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INCTAKE A STAND MINISTRIES: $16,000 · OtherTAKE A STAND MINISTRIESTHEOLOGY IN PERSPECTIVE: $11,000 · OtherNot By Works: $11,000 · OtherACCORDING TO PROPHECY MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherOLIVE TREE MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $47,270 · Other+13 moreANDY WOODS MINISTRIES: $16,000 · ReligionANDY WOODS MINIS…THE JOSHUA FUND: $15,000 · ReligionTHE JOSHUA FUNDBAPTIST BIBLE HOUR INC: $8,000 · ReligionBAPTIST BIBLE HO…ARIEL MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionARIEL MINISTRIESBEHOLD ISRAEL: $3,000 · ReligionBEHOLD ISRAELARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Education
Other$265,133Religion$47,000Health$10,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDY WOODS MINISTRIES: $16,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACCORDING TO PROPHECY MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOLIVE TREE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAPTIST BIBLE HOUR INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLamb & Lion Ministries Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLICAL DISCIPLESHIP MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetARIEL MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEHOLD ISRAEL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDY WOODS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSHUA FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCORDING TO PROPHECY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE TREE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST BIBLE HOUR INC ↗
  • Who funds Lamb & Lion Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICAL DISCIPLESHIP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIEL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BEHOLD ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Eleos Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nelson Family Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nelson Family Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nelson Family Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph