Skip to content

· Public charity

Neighborhood Land Power Project

NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECTs mission is to build a neighborhood rooted food and land system through community leadership developtment and land based strategies in west philadelphia

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $82,846, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,540 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,694 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$5,142
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER$16,000
NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST$15,426
EASTWICK COMMUNITY GARDEN$5,142
URBAN CREATORS$5,142
NORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT$5,142
INGLESIAS GARDENS CO$5,142
ONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER$5,142
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY PHILLY INC$5,142
KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST$5,142
PHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT$5,142
ARCADIA COMMONS$5,142
A LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING DBA MILL CREEK URBAN FARM$5,142
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ARCADIA COMMONS: $5k → 6%NORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT: $5k → 22%EASTWICK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $5k → 22%NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST: $15k → 22%THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $16k → 22%A LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING DBA MILL CREEK URBAN FARM: $5k → 22%KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST: $5k → 22%PHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT: $5k → 22%ONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 22%URBAN CREATORS: $5k → 22%INGLESIAS GARDENS CO: $5k → 22%INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY PHILLY INC: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shakespeare in Clark Park

Shakespeare in Clark Park produces cultural events which bridge the gap between audiences and artists by inviting community members to take part in making and shaping our productions. Our productions are rooted in the people of…

Arts & Culture
2
Garden Court Community Association Inc

The Garden Court Community Association (GCCA) is an organization of individuals and families living and working in the Garden Court neighborhood in West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Since the mid 1950's, GCCA has worked to foster, promote,…

—
3
Public Trust

Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.

Arts & Culture
4
Awbury Arboretum Association

Awbury Arboretum is a free public garden and farm serving Northwest Philadelphia. Building on the social justice values of our Quaker founders, we make a positive environmental impact, educate children and adults, and nurture an inclusive…

Environment
5
Grow Philly

Our mission is to build healthy, sustainable communities in Philadelphia. We do that by using our unique Mind, Body and Soul approach to helping the community learn to become healthy and sustainable.

Philanthropy
6
The Neighborhood Garden Project

We cultivate people through presence, soil, and shared work. The Neighborhood Garden Project exists to help individuals reconnect with identity, healing, and belonging by creating thoughtful spaces where people return to who they are…

Human Services
7
One Philly

One Philly's mission is to promote policies and actions championed by City leaders and to show the impact those policies and actions have on people's lives and the future of the City.

—
8
Sanctuary Farm Phila

Sanctuary Farm seeks to address the health inequities resulting from systemic racial oppression and economic injustice by converting abandoned and neglected areas in our community into spaces that promote safety, hospitality, nutrition and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Chestnut Hill Community Development Corp

Community economic development

Health
10
NORTH10 Philadelphia
Youth Development
11
Circular Philadelphia

To study, support, and promote circular economy principles and markets and to educate the public on the circular economy.

Community Improvement
12
Philly Neighborhood Networks

We organize and educate our neighbors about local issues affecting our NW Philadelphia neighborhood and the city in general. This includes maintaining working groups tasked with improving housing, education, criminal justice, racial…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Orchard Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Little Taste of Everything. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST: $15,426 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUSTPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT INC: $5,142 · EnvironmentPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT…THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $16,000 · Crime & LegalTHE PUBLIC INTEREST L…IGLESIAS GARDENS CO: $5,142 · Food & NutritionIGLESIAS GARDENS COA LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING: $5,142 · Food & NutritionA LITTLE TASTE OF EVE…URBAN CREATORS: $5,142 · Food & NutritionURBAN CREATORSARCADIA COMMONS: $5,142 · Community ImprovementARCADIA COMMONSNORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT: $5,142 · Community ImprovementNORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBO…KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST: $5,142 · Community ImprovementKENSINGTON CORRIDOR T…Indigenous Peoples Day Philly Inc: $5,142 · Arts & CultureEASTWICK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $5,142 · OtherONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,142 · Youth Development
Environment$20,568Crime & Legal$16,000Food & Nutrition$15,426Community Improvement$15,426Arts & Culture$5,142Other$5,142Youth Development$5,142

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $16,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST: $15,426 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIGLESIAS GARDENS CO: $5,142 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT INC: $5,142 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetARCADIA COMMONS: $5,142 over 1y, 96% of budgetIndigenous Peoples Day Philly Inc: $5,142 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetA LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING: $5,142 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,142 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT: $5,142 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST: $5,142 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Claneil Foundation IncPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Claneil Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Impact100 Philadelphia Inc · Merck Family Fund · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Independence Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neighborhood Land Power Project funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neighborhood Land Power Project. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Neighborhood Land Power Project?

    Find your warmest path to Neighborhood Land Power Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neighborhood Land Power Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph