Loading…
· Public charity
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECTs mission is to build a neighborhood rooted food and land system through community leadership developtment and land based strategies in west philadelphia
$91k
Granted FY2024
12
Grants
1
Communities
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$5,142
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER$16,000
- NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST$15,426
- EASTWICK COMMUNITY GARDEN$5,142
- INGLESIAS GARDENS CO$5,142
- ONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER$5,142
- A LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING DBA MILL CREEK URBAN FARM$5,142
- NORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT$5,142
- INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY PHILLY INC$5,142
- URBAN CREATORS$5,142
- PHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT$5,142
- ARCADIA COMMONS$5,142
- KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST$5,142
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21% — the area typically sits at 15%. 94% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Armenian Heritage Foundation of Philadelphia
To honor and promote Armenian culture
Arts & Culture
2
Pittsburgh Botanic Garden
Pittsburgh Botanic Garden inspires people to value plants, garden design and the natural world by cultivating plant collections of the Allegheny Plateau and temperate regions, creating display gardens, conducting educational programs and…
Youth Development
3
Cultural Equity Realty Trust
The Cultural Equity Realty Trust (CERT) is a nonprofit, preservation-focused real estate developer and steward for the Greater Philadelphia region.
Arts & Culture
4
City of Philadelphia Trustee
Organization's mission established in 1832 as a gift from james wills, a philadelphia merchant, to the city of philadelphia, wills eye's mission is to provide excellence in ophthalmic care to the community in need. wills eye advances this…
Health
5
Neighborhood Collaborative Community Gardens
NCCG is dedicated to enriching Camden City through community gardens, youth education, empowerment internerhips, farmers markets, urban revitilization, and sustainability efforts. Fostering a thriving community focused on urban gardening…
Environment
6
U City in Bloom
To enhance University City through artfully designed public gardens, community involvement, partnerships, and environmental education.
—
7
Sanctuary Farm Phila
Sanctuary Farm seeks to address the health inequities resulting from systemic racial oppression and economic injustice by converting abandoned and neglected areas in our community into spaces that promote safety, hospitality, nutrition and…
Food & Nutrition
8
NORTH10 Philadelphia
Youth Development
9
Grow Philly
Our mission is to build healthy, sustainable communities in Philadelphia. We do that by using our unique Mind, Body and Soul approach to helping the community learn to become healthy and sustainable.
Philanthropy
10
Circular Philadelphia
To study, support, and promote circular economy principles and markets and to educate the public on the circular economy.
Community Improvement
11
Frankford Community Development Corporation
The Frankford Community Development Corporation FCDC is dedicated to the asset-based development of Lower Northeast Philadelphia by focusing on job creation affordable and workforce housing development improving awareness and outcomes…
Housing & Shelter
12
Hilltop Urban Farm
To create and sustain a new, regional asset in south Pittsburghs Hilltop community, that is committed to growing food, growing farmers and growing a community. Hilltop Urban Farm will benefit its neighbors by being a catalyst for community…
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Orchard Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Peoples Day Philly Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Environment$20,568Crime & Legal$16,000Food & Nutrition$15,426Community Improvement$15,426Youth Development$5,142Arts & Culture$5,142Other$5,142
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST ↗
- Who funds INGLESIAS GARDENS CO ↗
- Who funds A LITTLE TASTE OF EVERYTHING DBA MILL CREEK URBAN FARM ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ONE ART COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARCADIA COMMONS ↗
- Who funds URBAN CREATORS ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY PHILLY INC ↗
- Who funds NORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Claneil Foundation IncPA20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Claneil Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Impact100 Philadelphia Inc · Merck Family Fund · Bread and Roses Community Fund · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial · Independence Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ARCADIA COMMONS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 454553633 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ARCADIA COMMONS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 96% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Neighborhood Land Power Project?
Find your warmest path to Neighborhood Land Power Project through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines