Skip to content

· Private foundation

Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$16kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$4kHousing & Shelter$4kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$2kArts & Culture$521Education$115
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TABLE Ministries Inc$3,000
GoFundMe org$2,600
Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina Inc$2,030
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Raleigh Inc$2,000
Urban Ministries of Durham$1,000
Khan Academy$110
Davidson CollegeWDAV 899 Classical Public Radio$100
WCPE$100
WQXR$86
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$5
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TABLE Ministries Inc: $3k → 13%Table Inc: $2k → 13%Table Inc: $1k → 13%Table Inc: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 77%.

Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Trlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 5 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$13k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+29%

Still filing today

80%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TABLE MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +84%
  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +279%
  • Urban Ministries of Durham Inc
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC PARISH OF CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • DC
    Durham County Food Pantry
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
7
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Techsoup Global

Techsoup's mission is to build a dynamic bridge that leverages technology to enable connections and innovative solutions for a more equitable planet.

—
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Urban Ministries of Durham Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC PARISH OF CHAPEL HILL: $16,000 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC PARISH OF CHAPEL HILLDurham County Food Pantry: $2,500 · OtherDurham County Food PantryCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF RALEIGH INC: $2,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF RALEIGH INCUrban Ministries of Durham Inc: $2,000 · OtherUrban Ministries of Durham IncSalvation Army: $1,040 · OtherCatholic Charities of Raleigh 501c3: $1,000 · OtherRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · OtherFood Bank of Central NC 501c3: $1,000 · Other+7 more: $1,306 · OtherTABLE MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTABLE MINISTRIES I…GOFUNDMEORG: $3,705 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEO…FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $2,030 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,020 · HealthEDUCATIONAL INFORMATION CORPORATION: $115 · Arts & CultureKHAN ACADEMY INC: $110 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5 · Education
Other$27,846Human Services$7,000Philanthropy$3,705Food & Nutrition$2,030Health$2,020Arts & Culture$115Education$115

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTABLE MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $3,705 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $2,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL INFORMATION CORPORATION: $115 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TABLE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Urban Ministries of Durham Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neal Kay Foundation Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph