Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ncmic Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of NCMIC FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $805k
$21,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$221,500
YALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTS$215,147
BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY$200,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL$93,735
THE NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION TRUST BOARD$75,000
PARKER UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANC$40,000
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam$34,500
LOGAN UNIVERSITY$34,000
WORLD FEDERATION OF CHIROPRACTIC$30,700
CBP NONPROFIT INC$25,000
ONE CHIROPRACTIC$25,000
NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES$21,000
MIMILABS INC$20,000
CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON$20,000
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$19,675
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 89% of grant dollars ($4.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($616k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANTHONY L ROSNER: $13k → 8%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $187k → 16%CBP NONPROFIT INC: $25k → 8%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%ST LUKES UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $222k → 11%MIMILABS INC: $20k → 8%LIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST: $20k → 10%NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $21k → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 14%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $8k → 13%PARKER UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANC: $20k → 14%APHA CHC SECTION: $9k → 14%PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCH: $38k → 12%LOGAN UNIVERSITY: $34k → 11%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $34k → 17%CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON: $20k → 8%JOEL P CARMICHAEL: $8k → 3%ROBERT J TRAGER: $10k → 13%ONE CHIROPRACTIC: $25k → 15%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $34k → 7%CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 18%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL: $187k → 16%CBP NONPROFIT INC: $25k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%LIFE CHIROPRACTIC WEST: $20k → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $34k → 17%CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON: $20k → 8%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $27k → 7%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL: $94k → 16%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $40k → 10%THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $20k → 17%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $11k → 7%BRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $94k → 16%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY: $200k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $29k → 16%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING: $172k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%RAND CORPORATION: $175k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $75k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%RAND CORPORATION: $166k → 14%RAND CORPORATION: $27k → 14%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $45k → 11%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US — 11% of all-years giving ($616k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
New Zealand$285k · 6 grants
Canada$183k · 11 grants
Netherlands$138k · 2 grants
Switzerland$5k · 1 grant
Denmark$5k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 32 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
54

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

28%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $319k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2020–2025 · $432k · revenue +26%
  • The Rand Corporation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +21%
  • WS
    WORLD SPINE CARE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +22% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $236k
  • BC
    BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING
    one grant, 2022 · $172k
  • BW
    BRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $94k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern Health Sciences University and the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $497,673 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $400,000 · OtherBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAYALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTS — $381,047 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTSUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $285,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAYALE UNIVERSITY — $236,447 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY — $200,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY — $195,562 · OtherBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING — $172,350 · OtherHAAVIK RESEARCH LIMITED — $160,000 · OtherVRIJE UNIVERSITEIT AMSTERDAM — $138,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC RESEARCH — $135,000 · Other+69 more — $1,230,248 · Other+69 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $431,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTS…NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY — $129,726 · EducationNORTHWESTERN HEALTH…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $98,304 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $63,576 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYCampbellsville University Inc — $60,000 · EducationCampbellsville Univ…LOGAN UNIVERSITY INC — $34,000 · Education+7 more — $104,932 · Education+7 moreThe Rand Corporation — $370,353 · Public BenefitWORLD SPINE CARE — $115,000 · Science & TechONECHIROPRACTIC INC — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,031,327Education$922,038Public Benefit$370,353Science & Tech$115,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $431,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $370,353 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY — $129,726 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD SPINE CARE — $115,000 over 4y, 47% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $98,304 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $71,288 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $63,576 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOGAN UNIVERSITY INC — $34,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetParker University — $23,932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WORLD SPINE CARE
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc
  • Who funds LOGAN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds ONECHIROPRACTIC INC
  • Who funds Parker University
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds LIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ncmic Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ncmic Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ncmic Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph