Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ncmic Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.6MEducation$1.3MScience & Tech$1.3MReligion$819kSocial Science$370kCommunity Improvement$50kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $805k
$21,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$221,500
YALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTS$215,147
BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY$200,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL$93,735
THE NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION TRUST BOARD$75,000
PARKER UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANC$40,000
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam$34,500
LOGAN UNIVERSITY$34,000
WORLD FEDERATION OF CHIROPRACTIC$30,700
ONE CHIROPRACTIC$25,000
CBP NONPROFIT INC$25,000
NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES$21,000
CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON$20,000
MIMILABS INC$20,000
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$19,675
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($4.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($616k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANTHONY L ROSNER: $13k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL: $187k → 16%CBP NONPROFIT INC: $25k → 8%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%ST LUKES UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $222k → 11%MIMILABS INC: $20k → 8%LIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST: $20k → 10%NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $21k → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 14%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $8k → 13%PARKER UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANC: $20k → 14%APHA CHC SECTION: $9k → 14%PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCH: $38k → 12%LOGAN UNIVERSITY: $34k → 11%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $34k → 17%CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON: $20k → 8%CHIROPRACTIC OUTREACH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $8k → 3%ROBERT J TRAGER: $10k → 13%ONE CHIROPRACTIC: $25k → 15%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $34k → 7%CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 18%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $187k → 16%CBP NONPROFIT INC: $25k → 8%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%LIFE CHIROPRACTIC WEST: $20k → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $34k → 17%CCGPP ATTN SUZI ANDERSON: $20k → 8%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $27k → 7%BRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $94k → 16%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY: $200k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $40k → 10%THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $20k → 17%NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $11k → 7%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL: $94k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $200k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $29k → 16%BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING: $172k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%RAND CORPORATION: $175k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $75k → 11%WORLD SPINE CARE: $25k → 10%RAND CORPORATION: $166k → 14%RAND CORPORATION: $27k → 14%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $45k → 11%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($616k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
New Zealand$285k · 6 grants
Canada$183k · 11 grants
Netherlands$138k · 2 grants
Switzerland$5k · 1 grant
Denmark$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 32 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
54

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

28%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $319k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2020–2025 · $432k · revenue +26%
  • The Rand Corporation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +21%
  • WS
    WORLD SPINE CARE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +22% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $236k
  • BC
    BAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING
    one grant, 2022 · $172k
  • BW
    BRIGHAM WOMEN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $94k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern Health Sciences University; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $497,673 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $400,000 · OtherBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAYALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTS: $381,047 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROJECTSUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $285,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAYALE UNIVERSITY: $236,447 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY: $200,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $195,562 · OtherBAKKEN CENTER FOR SPIRITUALITY & HEALING: $172,350 · OtherHAAVIK RESEARCH LIMITED: $160,000 · OtherVRIJE UNIVERSITEIT AMSTERDAM: $138,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC RESEARCH: $135,000 · Other+69 more: $1,230,248 · Other+69 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $431,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTS…NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $129,726 · EducationNORTHWESTERN HEALTH…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $98,304 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $63,576 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYCampbellsville University Inc: $60,000 · EducationCampbellsville Univ…LOGAN UNIVERSITY INC: $34,000 · Education+7 more: $104,932 · Education+7 moreThe Rand Corporation: $370,353 · Public BenefitWORLD SPINE CARE: $115,000 · Science & TechONECHIROPRACTIC INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,031,327Education$922,038Public Benefit$370,353Science & Tech$115,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $431,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $370,353 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $129,726 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD SPINE CARE: $115,000 over 4y, 47% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $98,304 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $71,288 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $63,576 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOGAN UNIVERSITY INC: $34,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONECHIROPRACTIC INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetParker University: $23,932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD SPINE CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOGAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONECHIROPRACTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Parker University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ncmic Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ncmic Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ncmic Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ncmic Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ncmic’s filings →

More from the funding graph