· Private foundation
Naylor Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k47 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN ENDOWNMENT FUND | $30,000 |
| GBMC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF YORK | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY & MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| THE MANOR FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM | $6,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $5,000 |
| THE CONVERSATION FUND | $5,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| STAMFORD HOUSE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC | $4,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $4,000 |
| VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC | $3,250 |
| STEAMBOAT DANCE THEATRE | $3,000 |
| LADEW GARDENS | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA2× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +17%
- CSCHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF YORK INC7× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +105%
- TMTHE MANOR FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- MHMARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -89%
- SHSTAMFORD HOUSE PRESERVATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
- NPNATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.
The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Potomac conservancy safeguards the land and waters of the potomac river and its tributaries and connects people to this national treasure.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maryland Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whole Foods Market Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fair Hill Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF YORK INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE GWATHMEY STEEPLECHASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAND PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Whole Foods Market Foundation ↗
- Who funds STEAMBOAT DANCE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds STAMFORD HOUSE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds LEG UP FARM INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA POINT TO POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kinsley Foundation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Halle Family Foundation Inc · LAiglon Fund · The Thomas F & Clementine L Mullan Foundation Inc · Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc · Dun Foundation · York County Community Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Amory S Carhart Memorial Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Naylor Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Land Preservation Trust Inc — 64% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Maryland Historical Society Inc — 9% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.