Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Navias Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$375k
Granted FY2022
82
Grants FY2022
14
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Navias Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Aspen Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 54 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Navias Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 64 organizations, $375k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

70
’20
69
’21
64
’22
62
’23
54
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$469kReligion$411kEducation$177kInternational$173kHuman Services$126kHealth$103kFood & Nutrition$97kArts & Culture$97kOther$0
02FY2022 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k74 grants · $162k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $121k
$2,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION$121,100
CONGREGATION BETH TORAH$30,600
SAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY$10,800
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,760
DALLAS OPERA$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SEACREST FOUNDATION$9,000
JACOBS AND CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$9,000
COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL$8,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$7,400
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$5,000
WOODALL ROGERS PARK FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 14%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 11%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 11%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 11%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 11%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%TRUSTED WORLD: $2k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%AUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $1k → 14%AUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $1k → 14%AUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $1k → 14%AUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $1k → 14%AUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $1k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 90 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+37%

Still filing today

78%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    Aspen Jewish Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $240k · revenue +96%
  • SF
    SEACREST FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +232%
  • TD
    The Dallas Opera
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • AE
    ASPEN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +123%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLASgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
4
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
7
Jewish Family Service of San Diego

Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.

Human Services
8
Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
10
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
11
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
12
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Honey Foundation for Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesChristian Youth CampsYouth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterJewish Community Organizati…Lgbtq+ Community SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal History MuseumsAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%58%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/90
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,475

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/86
Grantees still filing
69/86
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $367,200 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSEACREST FOUNDATION — $63,000 · PhilanthropySEACREST FOUNDATIONPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $43,800 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $20,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $23,600 · PhilanthropyAspen Jewish Center — $239,600 · OtherAspen Jewish CenterCONGREGATION BETH TORAH — $72,185 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH TORAH+60 more — $406,100 · Other+60 moreSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY — $43,200 · EducationSAN DIEGO J…COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $40,000 · EducationCOLORADO RO…CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNI…THE INSTITUTE FOR FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE — $17,500 · EducationTHE INSTITU…CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $14,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA …WESTOVER SCHOOL INC — $11,000 · EducationWESTOVER SC…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEG…ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $9,500 · Education+3 more — $13,000 · Education+3 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $34,460 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $28,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $21,000 · InternationalTHE WATER PROJECT INC — $8,500 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $7,500 · InternationalBNAI ZION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $5,000 · International+1 more — $2,000 · InternationalThe Dallas Opera — $50,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Jewish Historical Society — $5,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $40,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE — $10,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $5,000 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS FURNITURE BANK — $5,000 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES — $5,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN STREET REAL ESTATE — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $36,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $14,400 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$567,600Other$717,885Education$178,700International$111,460Arts & Culture$107,000Human Services$87,000Food & Nutrition$58,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $367,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAspen Jewish Center — $239,600 over 5y, 13% of budgetSEACREST FOUNDATION — $63,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Dallas Opera — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $43,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO JEWISH ACADEMY — $43,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $34,460 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $14,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $13,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWoodall Rodgers Park Foundation — $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTOVER SCHOOL INC — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG PREVENTION RESOURCES INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA Q INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI ZION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Mb and Edna Zale Foun…The Jeff & Bonnie Whi…Leichtag FoundationJewish Community Foun…Texas Instruments Fou…Dallas Jewish Communi…The Mankoff Family Fo…Hillcrest FoundationThe Intuit FoundationLeo & Rhea Fay Fruhma…Pryor Myra Stafford C…
Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA21.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Mb and Edna Zale Foundation · The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · The Mankoff Family Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Leo & Rhea Fay Fruhman Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Navias Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Navias Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Navias Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home