Skip to content

· Private foundation

Navarro Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$989k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$2.4MEducation$1.5MArts & Culture$1.2MHealth$535kRecreation & Sports$407kPhilanthropy$395kCivil Rights$335kFood & Nutrition$275kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $339k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $634k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASSION CORSICANAFAMILY SERVICE$200,000
NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE$70,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$64,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS$50,000
PRO LIFE NAVARRO COUNTY DBA HOPE CE$50,000
VOI C E$50,000
CORSICANANAVARRO COUNTY PUBLIC HEA$50,000
CORSICANA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SHEPARD INN TRANSITION HOUSING$40,000
JAMES L COLLINS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$40,000
WADE WELLNES CENTER$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL$30,000
NAVARRO COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CE$25,000
CHIRSTMAS IN APRIL - NAVARRO COUNTY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $582k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $75k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 10%MEAL ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $63k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $63k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $50k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $150k → 23%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $85k → 23%CHRISTMAS IN APRIL - NAVARRO COUNTY: $20k → 23%CHRISTMAS IN APRIL - NAVARRO COUNTY: $20k → 23%CHRISTMAS IN APRIL - NAVARRO COUNTY: $15k → 23%CHRISTMAS IN APRIL - NAVARRO COUNTY: $13k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 47 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
28

Total granted

$9.5M
$950k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+37%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORSICANA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $370k · revenue +145% · 76% of their budget
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +25%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA
    2× · 2018–2023 · $285k · revenue +59% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • NC
    NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +53%
  • NC
    NAVARRO CO EXPOSITION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $198k · revenue +142% · 40% of their budget
  • PT
    PALACE THEATER
    one grant, 2018 · $68k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Corsicana Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.

—
2
Navarro County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Provide a safe place where law enforcement, prosecutors, and child protective services case workers can investigate child abuse. Train and Supervise volunteers to serve CASAs

Crime & Legal
3
Navarro County Food Pantry

Provide food for needy people in county

—
4
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
5
Panola County Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of commerce in panola county texas

—
6
Comal County Child Welfare Board

Provide support to foster children and at risk families in Comal County Texas. Provide emergency support to victims of child abuse.

—
7
Central Texas Exposition

Supporting programs involving youth, students, and other services to benefit the local community

—
8
Navarro College Foundation Inc

To make available scholarships to students and contributions to navarro college for support. to have oversight function over collectibles owned by the foundation.

Education
9
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
10
Local North Texas Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
11
Veterans Center of North Texas Inc

To assist Veterans of all ages & service era & their families navigate through the network of public & private agencies to obtain assistance service & support to establish & maintain productive lifestyles within the North Texas communities.

Health
12
Northeast Texas Casa Inc

To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Navarro Council of the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Full Frame Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAVARRO COLLEGE: $1,150,000 · OtherNAVARRO COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $857,721 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $603,429 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMPASSION CORSICANA: $545,000 · OtherCOMPASSION CORSICANAVOICE: $470,000 · OtherVOICEIndividual grant recipient: $432,975 · OtherPALACE THEATRE: $385,300 · OtherCOMPASSION CORSICANAFAMILY SERVICE: $350,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $316,324 · Other+57 more: $3,397,334 · Other+57 moreCOMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA: $285,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SER…MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON W…CHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC: $108,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS …+1 more: $29,000 · Human ServicesCORSICANA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE INC: $370,000 · Arts & CultureNAVARRO COUNCIL OF THE ARTS INC: $285,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATION: $200,000 · HealthCORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · EducationMILDRED EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · EducationCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $74,000 · Recreation & SportsKERENS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitGOING BALLISTIC INC: $5,867 · Crime & Legal
Other$8,508,083Human Services$972,000Arts & Culture$670,000Health$200,000Education$97,000Recreation & Sports$74,000Public Benefit$15,000Crime & Legal$5,867

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORSICANA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE INC: $370,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $300,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA: $285,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetNAVARRO COUNCIL OF THE ARTS INC: $285,000 over 6y, 57% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $250,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATION: $200,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetNAVARRO CO EXPOSITION CENTER: $198,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC: $108,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY TEXAS INC: $98,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetCORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $74,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CONNECT: $27,494 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILDRED EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOING BALLISTIC INC: $5,867 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORSICANA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION DBA COMPASSION CORSICANA ↗
  • Who funds NAVARRO COUNCIL OF THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVARRO CO EXPOSITION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORSICANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OF THE RISING SUN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pearl Thornell Charitable FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pearl Thornell Charitable Foundation · United Way of Navarro County Texas Inc · J Tom Eady Charitable Trust · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Rena Fleming Foundation for Boys Inc · Eleanor Thornell Charitable Foundation · Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw Charitable Foundation · Annie L Robbins Charitable Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Navarro Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Navarro Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Navarro Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Navarro Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Navarro’s filings →

    More from the funding graph