Skip to content

· Public charity

National Writing Project Corporation

The NATIONAL WRITING PROJECT CORPORATION seeks to improve the teaching of writing as a voluntary support system for the core staff of the national writing project, a fiscally sponsored project of community initiatives, that engages a national group of leading educators to improve the teaching of writing and learning.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$12MCommunity Improvement$5.2MArts & Culture$3.5MHealth$142kYouth Development$118kHousing & Shelter$111kHuman Services$89kCivil Rights$89kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.1M
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$5,148,156
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY WRITING PROJECT$50,400
DENVER WRITING PROJECT$40,000
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WRITING PROJECT$16,800
GREATER MADISON WRITING PROJECT$8,400
APPALACHIAN WRITING PROJECT$8,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHAT CHEER WRITERS CLUB: $42k → 14%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $35k → 29%WHAT CHEER WRITERS CLUB: $24k → 14%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $35k → 29%Maker Education Initiative a project of Tides Center (Maker Ed): $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 117 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

117 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 112 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

117
86

Total granted

$14M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+28%

Still filing today

29%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesMembership BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Louisville Research Foundation
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +61%
  • CS
    Chico State Enterprises
    5× · 2017–2022 · $499k · revenue +138%
  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    5× · 2017–2022 · $214k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TI
    THE INVERNESS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $230k · revenue -64% · 76% of their budget
  • DU
    DREW UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $109k · revenue -1%
  • N
    NEXMAP
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue -97% · 27% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State University San Marcos Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Homestead National Historic Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/66
Grantees still filing
48/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $851,366 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $479,187 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $458,478 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $455,879 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin Madison: $449,400 · OtherMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $392,246 · Other+143 more: $8,630,854 · Other+143 moreCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $5,148,156 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES+1 more: $69,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $1,279,449 · EducationUniversity of Loui…Chico State Enterprises: $498,633 · EducationChico State Enterp…Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $213,761 · EducationResearch Foundatio…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $207,594 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UN…AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $138,368 · Education+29 more: $1,164,344 · Education+29 moreMuseum of African American History Inc: $91,000 · Arts & CultureNEXMAP: $70,000 · Arts & CultureThe National Public Housing Museum: $69,000 · Arts & CultureNEW BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $69,000 · Arts & CultureEAST SIDE FREEDOM LIBRARY: $69,000 · Arts & CultureHeritage Museum of Orange County: $69,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK: $69,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN MUSICOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $69,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $69,000 · Arts & CultureARTS & LITERATURE LABORATORY INC: $69,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $69,000 · Human ServicesLitArts RI: $66,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAN JUAN COLLEGE RETIREE HEALTH TRUST: $54,359 · Membership BenefitDIGITAL NEST INC: $41,600 · Youth Development
Other$11,717,410Philanthropy$5,217,156Education$3,502,149Arts & Culture$713,000Human Services$155,000Membership Benefit$54,359Youth Development$41,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $5,148,156 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $1,279,449 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChico State Enterprises: $498,633 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INVERNESS INSTITUTE: $230,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $213,761 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $207,594 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $138,368 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDREW UNIVERSITY: $109,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $108,985 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMuseum of African American History Inc: $91,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $84,459 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEXMAP: $70,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORICAL & CULTURAL SOCIETY: $69,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetThe National Public Housing Museum: $69,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $69,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNEW BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $69,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetEAST SIDE FREEDOM LIBRARY: $69,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetHeritage Museum of Orange County: $69,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK: $69,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetUlster County Historical Society: $69,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetAMERICAN MUSICOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $69,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $69,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetARTS & LITERATURE LABORATORY INC: $69,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetBIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $69,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $69,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budget826 NEW ORLEANS: $69,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetLitArts RI: $66,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFairfield University: $60,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $59,162 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JUAN COLLEGE RETIREE HEALTH TRUST: $54,359 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Japanese American Historical Society Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $44,627 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCity Center for Collaborative Learning: $43,112 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $42,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPF Bresee Foundation: $41,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC: $41,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEW DOOR VENTURES FKA GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY INC: $41,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $38,963 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAI Inc: $35,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $34,994 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds University of Louisville Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Chico State Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds THE INVERNESS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds DREW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Museum of African American History Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN75.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · American Chemical Society · Folds of Honor Foundation · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Hispanic Scholarship Fund · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · National Geographic Society · American Council of Learned Societies · Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc · Cornell University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Writing Project Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Writing Project Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Museum of African American History Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • Rider University: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Drew University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 207 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Writing Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph