Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Wic Association

The NATIONAL WIC ASSOCIATION provides its members with tools and leadership to expand and sustain effective nutrition services for mothers and young children.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$549kFood & Nutrition$216kEmployment$15k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $98,648 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $109,876 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,228 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC$33,166
FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH$10,284
HEALTH SERVICES - WIC$9,000
FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA$8,000
URBANA PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT$8,000
COLUMBUS PUBLIC HEALTH$8,000
COUNTY OF INYO$7,732
RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM PUBLIC HEALTH$7,725
PHFE-WIC PROGRAM$6,741
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER-WIC: $90k → 12%RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM PUBLIC HEALTH: $8k → 11%COUNTY OF INYO: $8k → 11%PHFE-WIC PROGRAM: $7k → 14%CALIFORNIA WIC ASSOCIATION: $75k → 16%LANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $75k → 9%KENMORE NY WIC OFFICE: $55k → 13%NEW YORK CITY HLTH & HOSPITALS CORP: $55k → 17%HEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC: $15k → 14%FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (FDOH): $15k → 15%MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $35k → 10%DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT #10: $7k → 13%MICHIGAN DEPT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $20k → 16%HEALTH SERVICES - WIC: $9k → 18%AFFINIA HEALTHCARE: $10k → 21%JOSEPHINE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT WIC PROGRAM: $55k → 18%PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $33k → 13%COUNTY OF GUILFORD: $9k → 16%FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH: $10k → 13%NORTH CENTRAL HEALTH DISTRICT: $12k → 23%EL PASO COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $13k → 9%COLUMBUS PUBLIC HEALTH: $8k → 15%SHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM INC: $9k → 11%URBANA PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT: $8k → 19%VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEY: $6k → 6%ST JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 12%HARFORD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $9k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
MD
NC
HI
LA
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regence Health Network Inc

To be a transformational leader in the delivery of integrated, innovative, and cost effective health services; we realize this by holding ourselves accountable to the highest standards in patient service, safety, and quality.

Health
2
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
North Country Family Health Center Inc

To improve the health, wellness, and quality of life of all individuals in our community by providing accessible, high quality, affordable, patient-centered and integrated health services.

Health
4
Eastern Iowa Health Center

Eastern Iowa Health Center provides accessible, high-quality healthcare services to those in need in the Linn County, Iowa area. Our services include family medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, labor and delivery, behavioral…

Health
5
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
6
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
7
Waimanalo Health Center

Waimanalo health center is committed to providing the highest level of primary and preventive health services, with special attention to the needs of native hawaiians and the medically underserved, and improving the health and wellness of…

Health
8
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
9
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Indiana Health Centers Inc

Improving the health status of the community at large with special emphasis on those who, because of their poverty, location in rural areas, or for other reasons, have health needs which are not being properly addressed.

Health
12
Waikiki Health

To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Affinia Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is California Wic Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOSEPHINE COUNTY DEP'T OF HEALTH — $55,000 · OtherJOSEPHINE COUNTY DEP'T OF HEALTHKENMORE NY WIC OFFICE — $55,000 · OtherKENMORE NY WIC OFFICEHENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY — $55,000 · OtherHENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARYNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION — $55,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATIONDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY SERVICES — $55,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY SERVICESMacomb Community Action — $34,899 · OtherMacomb Community ActionMICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES — $20,400 · Other+18 more — $167,589 · Other+18 moreCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC — $89,852 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INCLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $75,000 · HealthLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC — $33,166 · HealthPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INCSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $9,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA WIC ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA…
Other$497,888Health$207,018Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC — $89,852 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA WIC ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC — $33,166 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAffinia Healthcare — $9,707 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH SERVICES INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $6,741 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEY — $5,752 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds LANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Affinia Healthcare
  • Who funds HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncMA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · Direct Relief · American Heart Association Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Wic Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph