Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

National Wic Association

The NATIONAL WIC ASSOCIATION provides its members with tools and leadership to expand and sustain effective nutrition services for mothers and young children.

$110k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2024
14
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$99k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$8,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$33,166
Organizations funded a year
7 to 14
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
6
Total assets, FY2024
$11M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations National Wic Association funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$99k100%
FY202314$356k100%
FY20217$325kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$549kFood & Nutrition$216kEmployment$15k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
MD
NC
HI
LA
AL
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Charles Drew Health Center Inc$89,85210%
California Wic Association$75,00017%
Lanai Community Health Center$75,00011%
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation$55,0001n/a
Hennepin County Library$55,0001n/a
Josephine County Dep'T of Health$55,0001n/a
Macomb Community Action$34,8991n/a
Piedmont Health Services Inc$33,16610%
Michigan Dep of Health & Human Services$20,4001n/a
Health Career Connection Inc$15,0001n/a
Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of National Wic Association by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Charles Drew Health Center Inc$89,85210%
California Wic Association$75,00017%
Lanai Community Health Center$75,00011%
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation$55,0001n/a
Hennepin County Library$55,0001n/a
Josephine County Dep'T of Health$55,0001n/a
Macomb Community Action$34,8991n/a
Piedmont Health Services Inc$33,16610%
Michigan Dep of Health & Human Services$20,4001n/a
Health Career Connection Inc$15,0001n/a
Miami-Dade Elderly Services$14,5491n/a
El Paso County Public Health$12,6201n/a
North Central Health District$12,1661n/a
Fulton County Board of Health$10,2841n/a
Affinia Healthcare$9,70710%
Harford County Health Dept$9,0401n/a
Health Services Inc$9,00010%
Shenandoah Valley Medical System I$9,00010%
Guilford County Department of Health and Human Services$8,5001n/a
Columbus Public Health$8,0001n/a
Forsyth County$8,0001n/a
C-U Public Health District$8,0001n/a
Great Basin Unified Apcd$7,7321n/a
County of Riverside Community Health Agency$7,7251n/a
St Josephs Health Inc$7,3941n/a
Dhd #10$7,3791n/a
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc$6,74110%
Visiting Nurse Association of Central Jersey$5,75210%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($110k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget National Wic Association supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCharles Drew Health Center Inc: $89,852 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCalifornia Wic Association: $75,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLanai Community Health Center: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPiedmont Health Services Inc: $33,166 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAffinia Healthcare: $9,707 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Services Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShenandoah Valley Medical System I: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Foundation Enterprises Inc: $6,741 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVisiting Nurse Association of Central Jersey: $5,752 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncMA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · Direct Relief · American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Wic Association with peer funders

About National Wic Association

How much does National Wic Association give?
National Wic Association reported 9 itemized grants totaling $98,648, out of $109,876 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 14 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does National Wic Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (70%), Food & Nutrition (28%), Employment (2%).
Who are National Wic Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Charles Drew Health Center Inc ($90k), California Wic Association ($75k), Lanai Community Health Center ($75k).
Does National Wic Association fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Wic Association?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Reach Out and Read Inc, Direct Relief, American Heart Association Inc.
Where is National Wic Association based?
National Wic Association is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Wic Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph