Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Urban Indian Family Coalition

Activities and programs that expand the educational, employment and other opportunities available to members of the american indian and native alaska communities.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Human Services$3.4MCivil Rights$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.2MYouth Development$914kArts & Culture$879kHealth$598kEmployment$578kSocial Science$553kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $330k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.0M
$72,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Phoenix Indian Center$206,000
Las Vegas Indian Center$175,000
National Council of Urban Ind$145,000
Americans for Indian Opportun$134,000
American Indians in Texas$132,200
NA Indian Assoc of Detroit$129,000
Triangle Native American Soci$120,000
Oklahoma Indian Missionary Co$110,000
Tlingit & Haida Indians WA Ch$94,000
Native American Youth and Fam$94,000
American Indian OIC Inc$93,000
Aspen Institute$90,000
Denver Indian Center$89,000
Kansas City Indian Center$86,200
Tahoma Indian Center$83,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Phoenix Indian Center: $206k → 11%TUCSON INDIAN CENTER: $25k → 15%Ain Dah Yung Center: $29k → 14%Native American Community Ser: $32k → 13%American Indians in Texas: $132k → 16%Kansas City Indian Center: $86k → 15%Denver Indian Center: $89k → 12%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $64k → 10%Las Vegas Indian Center: $175k → 13%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $140k → 11%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS: $75k → 16%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $70k → 15%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $78k → 12%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $63k → 10%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $133k → 13%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $128k → 11%American Indians in Texas: $57k → 16%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $60k → 15%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $78k → 12%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $60k → 10%Las Vegas Indian Center: $95k → 13%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $119k → 11%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS: $61k → 16%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $47k → 15%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $73k → 12%Sacred Pipe Resource Center: $40k → 10%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $90k → 13%Phoenix Indian Center: $95k → 11%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS: $61k → 16%Kansas City Indian Center: $40k → 15%Denver Indian Center: $68k → 12%Sacred Pipe Resource Center: $40k → 10%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER INC: $85k → 13%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $83k → 11%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS: $30k → 16%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $25k → 15%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $30k → 12%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 10%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $81k → 13%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $44k → 11%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH: $300k → 14%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $55k → 9%National Council of Urban Ind: $145k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH: $75k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN IND: $70k → 14%American Indian Child Res Ct: $29k → 11%National Council of Urban Ind: $68k → 14%American Indian Child Res Ct: $28k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 39 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
10

Total granted

$10M
$414k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+125%

Still filing today

77%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $815k · revenue +41%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $688k · revenue +192%
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $682k · revenue +102% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • SI
    SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $220k · revenue +79%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPTY
    one grant, 2023 · $108k
  • AI
    American Indian Association of Tucson Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +125%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
2
American Indian Services

We're dedicated to helping Native Americans have access to a quality education, while still preserving their culture and honoring their heritage. Our mission is to provide preparatory programs for youth and financial assistance for those…

Human Services
3
American Indian Community Development Corporation

To provide culturally unique initiatives, housing & entrepreneurial programs that will strengthen the american indian community

Housing & Shelter
4
Division of Indian Work

Division of indian work's mission is to support and strengthen urban american indian people through culturally-based education, traditional healing approaches, and leadership development. we achieve this by focusing on community and…

Human Services
5
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission

Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…

Human Services
6
Northwest Indian Community Development Center Nwicdc

To identify coordinate and deliver resources that promote wellness and equity for American Indian families in Northwest and North-central Minnesota.

—
7
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
8
Southern Indian Health Council

Southern Indian Health Council is a Native American organization committed to protecting and improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of our American Indian Community. We provide a comprehensive range of wellness, health care,…

Health
9
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
10
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
11
International Indian Treaty Council Inc

The International Indian Treaty Council (IITC) is an organization of Indigenous Peoples working for self-determination and the recognition and protection of human rights, treaties, traditional cultures, and sacred lands and waters.

Civil Rights
12
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian Center and the most unlike its peers is Wis Teq Neemit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/52
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC — $814,500 · Human ServicesPHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INCLAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC — $681,500 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH — $658,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTHAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions — $441,450 · Human ServicesAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Co…DENVER INDIAN CENTER INC — $436,950 · Human ServicesDENVER INDIAN CENTER INCHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER — $348,450 · Human ServicesHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTERSACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER — $307,000 · Human ServicesSACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER+8 more — $420,000 · Human Services+8 moreAMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY — $676,150 · OtherAMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITYAMERICAN INDIAN OIC — $588,800 · OtherAMERICAN INDIAN OICNORTH AMERICAN INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF DETROIT INC — $492,450 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF DETRO…OKLAHOMA INDIAN MISSIONARY CONF — $489,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA INDIAN MISSIONARY CONFTRIANGLE NATIVE AMERICAN SOCIETY IN — $287,500 · OtherTRIANGLE NATIVE AMERICAN SOCIETY INTUNICA BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA — $237,300 · OtherTUNICA BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANATLINGIT AND HAIDA INDIANS OF ALASKA-WASHINGTON CHAPTER — $146,500 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $220,000 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDAmerican Indian Center of Indiana — $152,500 · Other+12 more — $702,600 · Other+12 moreAMERICAN INDIAN CENTER — $317,150 · Arts & CultureTahoma Indian Center — $250,100 · Arts & CultureNative American Community Development Institute — $208,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $688,000 · Social ScienceNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $621,400 · Youth DevelopmentMIGIZI Communications Inc — $151,950 · EducationGREATER CINCINNATI NATIVE AMERICAN COALITION — $97,500 · EducationTHE NATIVE PROJECT — $40,000 · EducationSEMILLAS SOCIEDAD CIVIL — $17,300 · Education+3 more — $24,900 · EducationFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $200,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTIVE INC — $45,000 · Community ImprovementWIS TEQ NEEMIT — $10,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $1,500 · Community Improvement
Human Services$4,107,850Other$3,993,300Arts & Culture$775,750Social Science$688,000Youth Development$621,400Education$331,650Community Improvement$256,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC — $814,500 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $688,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC — $681,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetAMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY — $676,150 over 6y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH — $658,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $621,400 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN OIC — $588,800 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions — $441,450 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetDENVER INDIAN CENTER INC — $436,950 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER — $348,450 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN CENTER — $317,150 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetSACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER — $307,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetTRIANGLE NATIVE AMERICAN SOCIETY IN — $287,500 over 4y, 56% of budgetTahoma Indian Center — $250,100 over 4y, 21% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $220,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNative American Community Development Institute — $208,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE — $200,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Indian Center of Indiana — $152,500 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc — $151,950 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $115,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CINCINNATI NATIVE AMERICAN COALITION — $97,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetAIN DAH YUNG (OUR HOME) CENTER — $81,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER — $68,800 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNative American Community Services of Erie and Niagara County Inc — $62,200 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION — $58,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOUP Council — $50,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE EARTH OF UNITED TRIBES HOUSING CORPORATION — $40,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NATIVE PROJECT — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN NATIVE VOICE EDUCATION PROJECT — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Indian Association of Tucson Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $19,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSEMILLAS SOCIEDAD CIVIL — $17,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK — $8,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC — $8,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER SCHOOL INC — $8,300 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN OIC ↗
  • Who funds American indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions ↗
  • Who funds DENVER INDIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE NATIVE AMERICAN SOCIETY IN ↗
  • Who funds Tahoma Indian Center ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
  • Who funds Native American Community Development Institute ↗
  • Who funds FIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Center of Indiana ↗
  • Who funds MIGIZI Communications Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CINCINNATI NATIVE AMERICAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds AIN DAH YUNG (OUR HOME) CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF BOSTON ↗
  • Who funds Native American Community Services of Erie and Niagara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED INDIANS OF ALL TRIBES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COUP Council ↗
  • Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE EARTH OF UNITED TRIBES HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIVE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Common Counsel Founda…Ndn Collective IncThe Minneapolis Found…Northwest Area Founda…Marguerite Casey Foun…Otto Bremer TrustAmerican Indian Youth…Seventh Generation Fu…Inatai FoundationNew Venture FundYouthprise
First Nations Development InstituteCO38.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Common Counsel Foundation · Ndn Collective Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · American Indian Youth Running Strong Inc · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Inatai Foundation · New Venture Fund · Youthprise

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Urban Indian Family Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
  • Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Urban Indian Family Coalition?

Find your warmest path to National Urban Indian Family Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines