Skip to content
National Network of Abortion Funds Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Network of Abortion Funds Inc

The national network of abortion funds (nnaf) is determined to build a world where all reproductive options are valued, accessible, and stigma-free.

$23M
Granted FY2025still arriving
97
Grants FY2025still arriving
46
States reached
$549k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$62MCivil Rights$1.9MHuman Services$916kEnvironment$665kPhilanthropy$228kInternational$145kPublic Benefit$78kCrime & Legal$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 97 grants below total $18,270,814, the rows itemized in this filing. The $22,527,374 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,256,560 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k79 grants · $13M
  • $250k+13 grants · $5.4M
$169,541
Median grant
46
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DC ABORTION FUND$549,433
RICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM PROJECT$547,040
BALTIMORE ABORTION FUND$517,140
CAROLINA ABORTION FUND$490,424
BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND$440,585
CHICAGO ABORTION FUND$396,792
ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST$394,022
ABORTION FUND OF OHIO$374,758
KANSAS ABORTION FUND$372,277
FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK$367,009
FUND TEXAS CHOICE$353,804
HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE$311,482
YELLOWHAMMER FUND$292,780
LILITH FUND$239,169
SHARE EQUITY$230,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $181k → 22%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $145k → 17%AFIYA CENTER: $165k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $549k → 14%RHODE ISLAND ABORTION FUND: $134k → 14%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $161k → 22%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $142k → 17%WOMEN'S HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND: $104k → 14%JUSTICE EMPOWERMENT NETWORK - JEN: $159k → 9%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $127k → 9%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $96k → 22%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND: $75k → 14%JUSTICE THROUGH EMPOWERMENT NETWORK - JEN: $12k → 9%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $66k → 9%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA FKA WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $40k → 22%WOMEN'S HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND: $28k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $20k → 9%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA DBA FKA WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $185k → 22%WOMEN'S HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND: $13k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $18k → 9%AFIYA CENTER: $21k → 14%AFIYA CENTER: $17k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62M · 90 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

90 repeat relationships: 83 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
51

Total granted

$62M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-18%

Still filing today

97%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC ABORTION FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +244% · 79% of their budget
  • AR
    ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +3% · 30% of their budget
  • AF
    ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +216% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

  • AR
    ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE
    one grant, 2020 · $124k
  • WH
    WOMEN HAVE OPTIONS OHIO
    one grant, 2020 · $89k
  • LF
    LILITH FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $88k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
2
Health Access Fund

Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.

Health
3
Rabbi Rm Goldstein Fund

Rabbi R.M. Goldstein Fund is organized for the primary purpose of providing financial assistance to persons who recieve abortion care in northwest Louisiana.

—
4
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
5
MEN4CHOICE Advocacy

Mobile Male Allies in the Fight for Reproductive Freedoms

Civil Rights
6
Prrowess Inc

Provision of reproductive health services

—
7
Lifechoices Womens Care Inc

To transform healthcare by providing natural, holistic and life affirming medical care - Family Medicine and Women?s Health medical services, education opportunities and ongoing support.

Health
8
Access Walk

Access Walk funds regional organizations that provide access to safe abortion. We know people from every community use abortion services, so we walk to ensure that those services remain available.

Health
9
Abortion Access for All

The organization's mission is to educate voters on the importance of protecting a woman's right to choose her own reproductive health care.

—
10
Abortion Action Missouri Foundation

Abortion Action Missouri Foundation envisions a world with stigma-free abortion access and reproductive freedom for all.

Human Services
11
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom Pac

Ballot issue political action committee advocating for the passage of a constitutional amendment in the State of Ohio to protect reproductive freedom.

—
12
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Abortion Fund; the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

44
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
106/106
Grantees still filing
65/106
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC: $4,300,106 · HealthABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INCCAROLINA ABORTION FUND: $3,750,448 · HealthCAROLINA ABORTION FUNDBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC: $3,370,041 · HealthBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INCAbortion Fund of Ohio: $1,935,961 · HealthAbortion Fund of OhioSHARE EQUITY: $885,105 · Health+27 more: $7,821,235 · Health+27 moreRICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM PROJECT: $3,817,512 · OtherRICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDO…CHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $2,523,644 · OtherCHICAGO ABORTION FUNDNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $944,213 · OtherNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUN…ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $594,503 · OtherEMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $591,796 · Other+68 more: $7,870,290 · Other+68 moreACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $4,365,641 · EnvironmentACCESS REPRODUCTIVE C…FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK: $1,846,796 · EnvironmentFLORIDA ACCESS NETWOR…FUND TEXAS CHOICE: $1,576,968 · EnvironmentFUND TEXAS CHOICENATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $642,494 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $622,344 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND: $593,112 · EnvironmentNational Network of Abortion Funds: $588,585 · EnvironmentNational Network of Abortion Funds: $569,691 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $460,486 · Environment+5 more: $1,390,559 · Environment+5 moreDC ABORTION FUND: $4,410,707 · Human ServicesDC ABORTION F…All-Options: $667,317 · Human ServicesAll-OptionsFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION: $634,191 · Human ServicesFAITH ROOTS R…Resources for Human Development Inc: $476,813 · Human ServicesResources for…RHODE ISLAND ABORTION FUND: $354,023 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $296,484 · Human Services+8 more: $1,165,325 · Human Services+8 moreHOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC: $840,937 · Civil RightsHOLLER HEA…Yellowhammer Fund: $734,821 · Civil RightsYellowhamm…TBA FUND INC: $625,940 · Civil RightsTBA FUND I…MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $575,789 · Civil RightsMIDWEST AC…COBALT FOUNDATION: $547,229 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOU…JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $460,373 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE…NEW RIVER ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $431,077 · Civil RightsNEW RIVER …ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK: $327,281 · Civil RightsTIDES FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM INC: $291,956 · Civil RightsABORTION RIGHTS FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $243,175 · Civil RightsOKLAHOMA RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE: $221,593 · Civil RightsCHELSEA'S FUND: $216,369 · Civil Rights+5 more: $658,122 · Civil Rights+5 moreNEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $385,755 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCAMBRIDGE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CONSULTANTS: $145,000 · InternationalSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $20,000 · Education
Health$22,062,896Other$16,341,958Environment$12,656,676Human Services$8,004,860Civil Rights$6,174,662Philanthropy$405,755International$145,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDC ABORTION FUND: $4,410,707 over 5y, 79% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $4,365,641 over 5y, 30% of budgetABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC: $4,300,106 over 5y, 54% of budgetRICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM PROJECT: $3,817,512 over 5y, 57% of budgetCAROLINA ABORTION FUND: $3,750,448 over 5y, 70% of budgetBLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC: $3,370,041 over 5y, 56% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $2,523,644 over 5y, 39% of budgetAbortion Fund of Ohio: $1,935,961 over 5y, 34% of budgetFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK: $1,846,796 over 5y, 65% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $1,576,968 over 5y, 34% of budgetNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $944,213 over 5y, 22% of budgetSHARE EQUITY: $885,105 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetHOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC: $840,937 over 5y, 36% of budgetYellowhammer Fund: $734,821 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetAll-Options: $667,317 over 5y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $642,494 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetKANSAS ABORTION FUND: $637,429 over 4y, 38% of budgetFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION: $634,191 over 4y, 14% of budgetPRETERM CLEVELAND INC: $626,837 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetTBA FUND INC: $625,940 over 5y, 22% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $622,344 over 5y, 10% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $594,503 over 5y, 17% of budgetLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND: $593,112 over 5y, 24% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $591,796 over 5y, 32% of budgetNational Network of Abortion Funds: $588,585 over 5y, 13% of budgetOUR JUSTICE: $582,275 over 5y, 22% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $575,789 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetPro-Choice Arizona: $574,534 over 4y, 30% of budgetNational Network of Abortion Funds: $569,691 over 5y, 33% of budgetWOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC: $568,258 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION: $547,229 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetEastern Massachusetts Abortion Fund: $523,252 over 5y, 55% of budgetJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION: $492,728 over 4y, 11% of budgetResources for Human Development Inc: $476,813 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $460,486 over 5y, 13% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $460,373 over 5y, 10% of budgetWILD WEST ACCESS FUND OF NEVADA: $450,668 over 4y, 26% of budgetINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING: $442,779 over 4y, 92% of budgetWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $437,869 over 4y, 25% of budgetNEW RIVER ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $431,077 over 5y, 35% of budgetCOLORADO DOULA PROJECT: $400,639 over 4y, 21% of budgetNEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $385,755 over 4y, 60% of budgetThe Nebraska Abortion & Reproductive Justice Fund: $383,606 over 4y, 20% of budgetMONTANA ABORTION ACCESS PROGRAM: $382,591 over 4y, 33% of budgetSILVER STATE HOPE FUND: $374,358 over 3y, 91% of budgetKentucky Health Justice Network Inc: $373,304 over 4y, 12% of budgetBOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC: $365,093 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWest Fund: $355,929 over 5y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Abortion Fund of Ohio ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHARE EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Yellowhammer Fund ↗
  • Who funds All-Options ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds FAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds PRETERM CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds TBA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds National Network of Abortion Funds ↗
  • Who funds OUR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Pro-Choice Arizona ↗
  • Who funds National Network of Abortion Funds ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Massachusetts Abortion Fund ↗
  • Who funds JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD WEST ACCESS FUND OF NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hopewell FundWomen Donors NetworkThe Prentice Foundati…Anderson-Rogers Found…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Susan Thompson Bu…The Brigid Alliance I…Planned Parenthood Fe…Apiary for Practical …New Venture FundThe Grove FoundationNational Institute fo…
Hopewell FundDC93.4× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · Women Donors Network · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · The Brigid Alliance Inc · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · Apiary for Practical Support Inc · New Venture Fund · The Grove Foundation · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Network of Abortion Funds Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Network of Abortion Funds Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Tides for Reproductive Freedom Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 154 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Network of Abortion Funds’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home