· Public charity
Apiary for Practical Support Inc
Apiary for practical support, inc (aps) is a national hub for groups that provide logistical assistance including transportation, lodging, and childcare to people seeking abortions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $180,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $200,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAROLINA ABORTION FUND | $20,000 |
| SAFE ABORTIONS FOR EVERYONE MAINE | $20,000 |
| COBALT ABORTION FUND | $20,000 |
| BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND | $20,000 |
| FAITH CHOICE OHIO | $20,000 |
| THE GREEN CAB | $20,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS COALITION | $20,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $20,000 |
| NORTH JERSEY PRACTICAL SUPPORT | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 32% of Apiary for Practical Support Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To facilitate with women who need help financially to help pay for their abortion, whether abortion is needed for emotional, maternal or fetal health. To help medical facilities who perform abortions open and stay open.
The New Jersey Abortion Access Fund advances abortion access and bodily autonomy by funding abortions for people traveling to, from, and within New Jersey.
Texas Equal Access Fund provides funding to low-income people in the northern region of Texas who are seeking abortion and cannot afford it, while simultaneously working to end barriers to abortion access through community education and…
The organization provides direct financial assistance to Individuals seeking abortions.
The DC Abortion Fund helps pay for the abortion care of anyone living in or traveling to the DC Metro region, without restrictions or requirements. DC is a vital access point for the entire East Coast,
The Utah Abortion Fund provides financial and practical support for people traveling to, from, and within Utah seeking safe reproductive care. We believe that everyone deserves to have access to the reproductive health care they need, free…
Abortion Fund of Ohio provides financial assistance and practical support (transportation / housing / etc) to help patients afford contraception, emergency contraception, and abortion services.
Our mission it to provide funding and a voice for all Kansans in need of abortion care.
We affirm a persons right to control their body and work to ensure that all people have access to quality medical care, regardless of their economic situation. Working with local medical providers, we provide compassionate and empowering…
Cascades Abortion Support Collective (CASC) provides free physical, emotional, informational and logistic support to individuals accessing abortion in Oregon. We support people regardless of age, race, income, gender identity, sexual…
New river abortion access fund builds power and provides direct financial and practical support to southwest virginians and appalachians seeking abortion care. we dedicated to ensuring that all people have the autonomy and resources to…
Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Ridge Abortion Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO MI ↗
- Who funds Faith Choice Ohio ↗
- Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FIRST STATE ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds The Nebraska Abortion & Reproductive Justice Fund ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Safe Abortions For Everyone ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Kentucky Health Justice Network Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Hopewell Fund · The Brigid Alliance Inc · Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc · Women Donors Network · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · New Venture Fund · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Assurant Foundation · Lynn Stern & Jeremy Lang Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Apiary for Practical Support Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Apiary for Practical Support Inc?
Find your warmest path to Apiary for Practical Support Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.