Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Brigid Alliance Inc

Alleviating constraints on individuals who must travel for safe and appropriate family planning services, by providing assistance with transportation, accommodation, meals, childcare, and emotional support.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Health$528kCivil Rights$375kEnvironment$150kHuman Services$40k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $92,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,616,542 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,523,792 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDEN SURGICAL CENTER$42,750
DUPONT CLINIC$30,000
PARTNERS IN ABORTION CARE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABORTION FUND OF ARIZONA PRO-CHOICE ARIZONA ACTION FUND: $20k → 11%REPROCARE ABORTION FREEDOM PARTNERSHIP: $100k → 8%ACCESS RJ: $20k → 10%EDEN SURGICAL CENTER: $43k → 14%FUND TEXAS CHOICE: $75k → 10%ARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK: $20k → 17%DUPONT CLINIC: $30k → 14%TAMPA BAY ABORTION FUND: $20k → 12%NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $75k → 15%COLORADO DOULA PROJECT: $20k → 12%MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $75k → 14%ELEVATED ACCESS: $100k → 19%LOUISIANA ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $20k → 23%PARTNERS IN ABORTION CARE: $20k → 11%BALTIMORE ABORTION FUND: $20k → 19%KENTUCKY HEALTH JUSTICE NETWORK: $20k → 15%UTAH ABORTION FUND ABORTION FREEDOM PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 8%COBALT: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
OR
SD
OH
CA
CO
KY
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abortion Access Fund Incorporated

To facilitate with women who need help financially to help pay for their abortion, whether abortion is needed for emotional, maternal or fetal health. To help medical facilities who perform abortions open and stay open.

Health
2
National Network of Abortion Funds

Texas Equal Access Fund provides funding to low-income people in the northern region of Texas who are seeking abortion and cannot afford it, while simultaneously working to end barriers to abortion access through community education and…

Environment
3
Dc Abortion Fund

The DC Abortion Fund helps pay for the abortion care of anyone living in or traveling to the DC Metro region, without restrictions or requirements. DC is a vital access point for the entire East Coast,

Human Services
4
New Jersey Abortion Access Fund

The New Jersey Abortion Access Fund advances abortion access and bodily autonomy by funding abortions for people traveling to, from, and within New Jersey.

Philanthropy
5
Utah Abortion Fund

The Utah Abortion Fund provides financial and practical support for people traveling to, from, and within Utah seeking safe reproductive care. We believe that everyone deserves to have access to the reproductive health care they need, free…

Health
6
Clinic Access Support Network

Clinic Access Support Network (CASN) provides transportation, accommodations, childcare assistance, and compassionate care to Houstonians seeking abortion services. During this year, the organization paused coordination of direct services.

Environment
7
The Nebraska Abortion & Reproductive Justice Fund

Our mission at NEAR is to remove barriers on every level for Nebraskans seeking abortion access. We envision a world in which all pregnant people can plan their families as they see fit which includes equitable access to abortion care.

—
8
Abortion Rights Fund of Western Massachusetts Inc

The organization provides direct financial assistance to Individuals seeking abortions.

Civil Rights
9
First State Abortion Fund

The First State Abortion Fund is a local, volunteer-powered program rooted in a reproductive justice framework, with the mission of breaking down financial barriers and increasing abortion access in Delaware. Our fund provides financial…

Health
10
Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire

The Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire removes financial barriers for anyone receiving abortion care in or from New Hampshire through direct service funding and movement building guided by patient need.

Health
11
Health Access Fund

Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.

Health
12
Abortion Freedom Fund

We give financial assistance to values-aligned partners who provide abortion pills by mail.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Reproductive Care - Southeast and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Elevated Access Inc — $100,000 · Civil RightsElevated Access IncJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE PROCESS INCMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION — $75,000 · Civil RightsMIDWEST ACCESS COALITIONCOBALT FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOUNDATIONARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK — $20,000 · Civil RightsARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORKTBA FUND INC — $20,000 · Civil RightsTBA FUND INCNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND — $75,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS F…ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST — $75,000 · EnvironmentACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - …FUND TEXAS CHOICE — $75,000 · EnvironmentFUND TEXAS CHOICELOUISIANA ABORTION FUND — $20,000 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA ABORTION FUNDFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK — $20,000 · EnvironmentFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORKINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING — $100,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING …EDEN SURGICAL CENTER — $42,750 · OtherEDEN SURGICAL CENTERDUPONT CLINIC — $30,000 · OtherDUPONT CLINICACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $20,000 · OtherACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUST…PRO-CHOICE ARIZONA ACTION FUND — $20,000 · OtherPRO-CHOICE ARIZONA ACTIO…PARTNERS IN ABORTION CARE — $20,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN ABORTION CAR…SHARE EQUITY — $120,000 · HealthSHARE EQUITYCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $20,000 · HealthCAROLINA ABORTION FUNDABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC — $20,000 · HealthABORTION FUND OF MARYL…COLORADO DOULA PROJECT — $20,000 · HealthCOLORADO DOULA PROJECTAbortion Fund of Ohio — $20,000 · HealthAbortion Fund of OhioKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $20,000 · HealthKentucky Health Justic…FAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION — $20,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE THROUGH EMPOWERMENT NETWORK SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human Services
Civil Rights$335,000Environment$265,000Other$232,750Health$220,000Human Services$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHARE EQUITY — $120,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetElevated Access Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING — $100,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION — $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND — $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST — $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE — $75,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAROLINA ABORTION FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUSTICE THROUGH EMPOWERMENT NETWORK SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK — $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLORADO DOULA PROJECT — $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetAbortion Fund of Ohio — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTBA FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Network of A…Hopewell FundAmalgamated Charitabl…Women Donors NetworkThe Prentice Foundati…Rockefeller Philanthr…Apiary for Practical …Tara Health FoundationThe Susan Thompson Bu…ImpactassetsincNew Venture FundAnderson-Rogers Found…
National Network of Abortion Funds IncOR39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Hopewell Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Women Donors Network · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Apiary for Practical Support Inc · Tara Health Foundation · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Impactassetsinc · New Venture Fund · Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Brigid Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brigid Alliance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Brigid Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home