Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Low Income Housing Coalition

The NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION (nlihc) is dedicated to achieving racially and socially equitable public policy to ensure the lowest-income people have quality homes that are accessible and affordable in communities of their choice.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$13MHuman Services$1.1MCrime & Legal$1.1MCommunity Improvement$1.0MSocial Science$310kPublic Safety & Disaster$279kCivil Rights$240kPublic Benefit$220kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $1,439,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,844,927 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $405,927 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $317k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER$80,000
WISCONSIN BALANCE OF STATE CONTINUUM OF CARE INC$80,000
MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE$80,000
LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA$80,000
COMMUNITY JUSTICE PROJECT INC$80,000
HOMELESS AND HOUSING COALITION OF KENTUCKY$80,000
STATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT INC$80,000
SOUTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPS$50,000
VIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE$50,000
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO$50,000
MARYLAND CENTER ON ECONOMIC POLICY$50,000
PROSPERITY INDIANA$50,000
KENTUCKY EQUAL JUSTICE CENTER$50,000
BLACK CLERGY COLLABORATIVE OF MEMPHIS$50,000
MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ARIZONA HOUSING COALITION: $130k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $50k → 10%IDAHO ASSET BUILDING NETWORK (JANNUS INC): $130k → 8%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $80k → 12%HAWAI'I APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $185k → 9%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $120k → 9%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $50k → 10%LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA: $130k → 16%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $50k → 10%CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $150k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC (NCCEH): $20k → 13%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $120k → 12%COBURN PLACE INDIANAPOLIS: $85k → 16%BYRD BARR PLACE: $80k → 9%WEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $105k → 15%ARIZONA HOUSING COALITION: $115k → 11%IDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDREN (JANNUS INC): $100k → 8%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $80k → 12%HAWAI'I APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $80k → 9%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $80k → 9%LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA: $80k → 16%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $50k → 10%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $50k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $85k → 15%ARIZONA HOUSING COALITION: $80k → 11%IDAHO CENTER FOR FISCAL POLICY (JANNUS INC): $80k → 8%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $80k → 12%INVISIBLE PEOPLE: $50k → 14%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $75k → 9%LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA: $50k → 16%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $50k → 10%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $50k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $40k → 15%ARIZONA HOUSING COALITION: $75k → 11%JANNUS INC: $50k → 8%MINNESOTA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $30k → 14%INVISIBLE PEOPLE 2023: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $41k → 9%LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA: $50k → 16%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $30k → 10%IDAHO ASSET BUILDING NETWORK (JANNUS INC): $50k → 8%MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS: $30k → 9%LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA: $80k → 16%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF STREET PAPERS-NORTH AMERICA (REAL CHANGE NEWS): $65k → 9%JANNUS INC: $50k → 8%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF STREET PAPERS-NORTH AMERICA (REAL CHANGE NEWS): $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of National Low Income Housing Coalition’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 6% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 3% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

National Low Income Housing Coalitionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 57 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
65

Total granted

$13M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+23%

Still filing today

95%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $495k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO
    6× · 2018–2024 · $514k · revenue +105%
  • GA
    GEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $483k · revenue +50% · 30% of their budget
  • JI
    JANNUS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $460k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -48%
  • MW
    Miami Workers Center Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $110k · revenue -30%
  • VA
    VERMONT AFFORDABLE HOUSING COALITION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
2
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
3
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
4
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
5
Law Center for Better Housing

To promote the rights of renters to safe, accessible, and affordable housing on a non-discriminatory basis through education, outreach, supportive services, advocacy, and legal representation.

Crime & Legal
6
National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials

To advance the creation of strong, sustainable and affordable communities through advocacy, professional development, and empowerment of our diverse members.

—
7
Housing Oregon

Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…

Housing & Shelter
8
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
9
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
10
Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund

The Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund elects candidates, educates voters and decision-makers, and amplifies the voices and priorities of people and communities most impacted by housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
11
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
12
Council of Community Housing Organizations

To provide technical assistance in affordable housing development to community based housing providers

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Coalition to End Hom and the most unlike its peers is American Academy of Pediatrics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportPublic Library OperationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%49%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/134
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/127
Grantees still filing
81/127
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $483,000 · Housing & ShelterGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIE…Alaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessness — $455,000 · Housing & ShelterAlaska Coalition on Housing …HOMELESS AND HOUSING COALITION OF KENTUCKY INC — $375,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMELESS AND HOUSING COALITI…HOUSING NETWORK OF RHODE ISLAND — $310,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING NETWORK OF RHODE ISL…Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service — $215,000 · Housing & ShelterAVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $175,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK OF NEW JERSEY INC — $175,000 · Housing & ShelterKANSAS STATEWIDE HOMELESS COALITION INC — $165,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterWashington Low Income Housing Alliance — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWORD INC — $160,000 · Housing & Shelter+23 more — $1,713,000 · Housing & Shelter+23 moreNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING POLICY CENTER — $668,568 · OtherNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING POLICY CE…MINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $360,000 · OtherMINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIPHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $350,000 · OtherHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIAVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE — $350,000 · OtherVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCEUTAH HOUSING COALITION INC — $350,000 · OtherUTAH HOUSING COALITION INCHousing Action Illinois — $330,000 · OtherHousing Action IllinoisNORTH CAROLINA HOUSING COALITION INC — $255,000 · OtherFLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INC — $203,000 · OtherGreater New Orleans Housing Alliance — $280,000 · OtherMARYLAND CENTER ON ECONOMIC POLICY INC — $310,000 · Other+37 more — $2,530,000 · Other+37 moreJANNUS INC — $460,000 · Human ServicesJANNUS INCARIZONA HOUSING COALITION — $400,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA HOUSING COALITI…MICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS — $396,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN COALITION AGAI…LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA — $390,000 · Human ServicesLOW INCOME HOUSING COAL…HAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE — $265,000 · Human ServicesHAWAII APPLESEED CENTER…HOUSING CALIFORNIA INC — $240,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING CALIFORNIA INCWEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $230,000 · Human ServicesWEST VIRGINIA COALITION…Colorado Coalition for the Homeless — $220,000 · Human ServicesColorado Coalition for …ARKANSAS COALITION OF HOUSING &NEIGHBORHOOD GROWTH FOR EMPOWERMENT — $215,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS COALITION OF H…EMPOWER MISSOURI — $180,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $150,000 · Human Services+9 more — $590,000 · Human Services+9 moreINDIANA ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $410,000 · Community ImprovementINDIANA AS…HOMELESS NETWORK OF TEXAS — $250,000 · Community ImprovementHOMELESS N…NEBRASKA HOUSING DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION — $155,000 · Community ImprovementNEBRASKA H…COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN — $130,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …NEIGHBORHOOD DATA WORKS — $80,000 · Community ImprovementEMPOWER DC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $80,000 · Community ImprovementNeighborhood Preservation Inc — $80,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ROAD TO RIGHTEOUSNESS FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementOKLAHOMA COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC — $75,000 · Community Improvement+5 more — $200,000 · Community Improvement+5 moreLouisiana Fair Housing Action Center Inc — $220,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $160,000 · Civil RightsCONNECTICUT FAIR HOUSING CENTER INC — $160,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $80,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · Civil RightsCOMMUNITY JUSTICE PROJECT INC — $80,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA APPLESEED ACTION FUND — $80,000 · Civil RightsSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC — $35,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $230,000 · Crime & LegalOFFICE OF KENTUCKY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC — $150,000 · Crime & LegalVIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $80,000 · Crime & LegalCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $80,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC — $59,000 · Crime & LegalNational Housing and Community Development Law Project — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $514,000 · EmploymentMiami Workers Center Inc — $110,000 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$4,546,000Other$5,986,568Human Services$3,736,000Community Improvement$1,700,000Civil Rights$905,000Crime & Legal$649,000Employment$624,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING POLICY CENTER — $668,568 over 6y, 100% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $514,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $483,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetJANNUS INC — $460,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAlaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessness — $455,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetINDIANA ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $410,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetARIZONA HOUSING COALITION — $400,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetMICHIGAN COALITION AGAINST HOMELESSNESS — $396,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION OF ALABAMA — $390,000 over 4y, 76% of budgetHOMELESS AND HOUSING COALITION OF KENTUCKY INC — $375,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetMINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $360,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $350,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE — $350,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetUTAH HOUSING COALITION INC — $350,000 over 4y, 55% of budgetHousing Action Illinois — $330,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHOUSING NETWORK OF RHODE ISLAND — $310,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER ON ECONOMIC POLICY INC — $310,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetGreater New Orleans Housing Alliance — $280,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetHAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE — $265,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HOUSING COALITION INC — $255,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetHOMELESS NETWORK OF TEXAS — $250,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC — $240,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $230,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $230,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $220,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLouisiana Fair Housing Action Center Inc — $220,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetARKANSAS COALITION OF HOUSING &NEIGHBORHOOD GROWTH FOR EMPOWERMENT — $215,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetTexas Low-Income Housing Information Service — $215,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetFLORIDA HOUSING COALITION INC — $203,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetEMPOWER MISSOURI — $180,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC — $180,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $175,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK OF NEW JERSEY INC — $175,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetKANSAS STATEWIDE HOMELESS COALITION INC — $165,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $160,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $160,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWashington Low Income Housing Alliance — $160,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetHOMEWORD INC — $160,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FAIR HOUSING CENTER INC — $160,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetNEBRASKA HOUSING DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION — $155,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetWISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $150,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOFFICE OF KENTUCKY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC — $150,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAYUDA LEGAL PUERTO RICO INC — $135,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetSUPPORTIVE HOUSING NETWORK OF NEW YORK INC — $130,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN — $130,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT HOUSING INC — $116,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $114,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Neighborhood Reinvest…Annie E Casey Foundat…The Kresge FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationCenter on Budget and …New Venture FundEqual Justice WorksCenter for Responsibl…Td Charitable Foundat…Wells Fargo Foundation
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD34.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Kresge Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Center on Budget and Policy Priorities · New Venture Fund · Equal Justice Works · Center for Responsible Lending · Td Charitable Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Low Income Housing Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Housing Alliance Delaware — 74% of income from government
  • Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness Inc — 54% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Connecticut Fair Housing Center Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Legal Services of North Florida Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Housing and Community Development Network of New Jersey Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Partnership for Strong Communities — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home