Skip to content
National Council of Urban Indian Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Council of Urban Indian Health

The NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH (ncuih) is a national 501(c)(3) organization devoted to the support and development of quality, accessible, and culturally competent health services for american indians and alaska natives (ai/ans) living in urban settings.

$416k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$6.8MHuman Services$393kCommunity Improvement$316kEducation$265kYouth Development$230kCivil Rights$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$89kPublic Benefit$9k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $406,586, the rows itemized in this filing. The $415,586 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $302k
$30,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALT LAKE$93,100
SAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER$84,600
NATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$74,348
FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE$50,000
NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES$32,063
HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC$30,500
FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT$11,793
NATIVE HEALTH$8,500
KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER$8,126
BAKERSFIELD AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT$7,600
SOUTH DAKOTA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH$5,956
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $747k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $104k → 14%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $134k → 15%DENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $124k → 12%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $32k → 14%TEXAS NATIVE HEALTH DALLAS INTER-TRIBAL CENTER: $15k → 14%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $30k → 15%DENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 12%NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES: $42k → 19%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $146k → 14%TEXAS NATIVE HEALTH URBAN INTER-TRIBAL CENTER: $14k → 14%KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER: $8k → 15%NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES: $32k → 19%NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES: $24k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
OR
NV
SD
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NM
KS
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 29 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
12

Total granted

$6.1M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+377%

Still filing today

100%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Bakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $551k · revenue +1%
  • FA
    FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $444k · revenue +70%
  • UI
    Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake
    4× · 2021–2024 · $327k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UI
    URBAN INTER-TRIBAL CENTER TEXAS
    one grant, 2021 · $240k
  • TI
    TUCSON INDIAN CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $235k
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $230k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Indian Health Council

Southern Indian Health Council is a Native American organization committed to protecting and improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of our American Indian Community. We provide a comprehensive range of wellness, health care,…

Health
2
National Indian Health Board

Established by the tribes to advocate as the united voice of federally recognized american indian and alaska native tribes, nihb seeks to reinforce tribal sovereignty, strengthen tribal health systems, secure resources, and build capacity…

—
3
Northern Valley Indian Health Inc

To provide health services to eligible american indians in the service areas of Glenn and Yolo counties and portions of Colusa, Butte and Tehama counties. Medical and dental services are provided to the general community as well.

Health
4
Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley

To help ensure the survival and healing of american indians and alaskan natives and the greater community by providing high quality, comprehensive health care and cultural services.

Health
5
Native Healing Llc
Animals
6
Alaska Native Health Board

The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.

—
7
Mact Health Board Incorporated American Indian Tribal Organization

Mact health board provides medical outpatient, dental, and behavioral health services to native americans and other communities of alpine, mariposa, amador, calaveras, and tuolumne counties.

Health
8
Feather River Tribal Health Inc

To elevate the health status of the American Indian people in our service area and all people in our communities to the highest level possible through a comprehensive system of preventive and therapeutic services.

Health
9
The Center for Native Health Inc

Integrate community-based traditional knowledge into all facets of Native health care and education and to promote wellness and balance for Indigenous peoples.

Education
10
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
11
Sonoma County Indian Health Project Inc

To continually improve and maintain a comprehensive health care system to serve the needs and traditional values of our american indian community.

Health
12
Indian Health Council Inc

To continually nurture a balance of physical, mental, and spiritual well-being for indigent native americans.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Native Project; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Tribal Emergency Management Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
27/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake: $326,960 · OtherUrban Indian Center of Salt LakeAmerican Indian Health Service of Chicago: $312,228 · OtherAmerican Indian Health Service of ChicagoNative American Health Center Inc: $295,476 · OtherNative American Health Center IncHELENA INDIAN ALLIANCE INC: $281,878 · OtherHELENA INDIAN ALLIANCE INCURBAN INTER-TRIBAL CENTER TEXAS: $240,476 · OtherURBAN INTER-TRIBAL CENTER TEXASTUCSON INDIAN CENTER: $235,476 · OtherTUCSON INDIAN CENTERFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $230,476 · OtherFRIENDSHIP HOUSENATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION NORTHWEST: $226,913 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION NORTHWESTINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF CLARA VALLEY: $225,000 · OtherINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF CLARA VALLEYNATIVE AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $208,726 · OtherNATIVE HEALTH: $200,577 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES BALTIMORE: $163,664 · OtherNATIVE DIRECTIONS INC: $157,121 · OtherGERALD L IGNACE HEALTH CENTER: $146,916 · OtherNEBRASKA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH COALITION INC: $131,491 · Other+5 more: $537,334 · Other+5 moreBakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc: $550,961 · HealthBakersfield American Indian Health Pro…FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT: $443,968 · HealthFRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECTINDIAN FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC OF GREAT FALLS INC: $294,476 · HealthINDIAN FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC OF GREAT F…SAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER: $275,076 · HealthSAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTE…NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $274,569 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INCSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $260,407 · HealthSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDALL NATIONS HEALTH CENTER INC: $154,000 · HealthALL NATIONS HEALTH CENTER INCBUTTE NATIVE WELLNESS CENTER: $148,565 · HealthFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE: $145,269 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $123,975 · Health+3 more: $151,271 · Health+3 moreUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $281,960 · Human ServicesUNITED AME…HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $172,860 · Human ServicesHEART OF A…DENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SER: $164,053 · Human ServicesDENVER IND…NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES INC: $98,785 · Human ServicesNATIVE AME…TEXAS NATIVE HEALTH: $29,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON: $316,179 · Community ImprovementTHE NATIVE PROJECT: $291,225 · EducationAmerican Indian Health & Services: $105,599 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,920,712Health$2,822,537Human Services$746,658Community Improvement$316,179Education$291,225Arts & Culture$105,599

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc: $550,961 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetFRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT: $443,968 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetUrban Indian Center of Salt Lake: $326,960 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON: $316,179 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Indian Health Service of Chicago: $312,228 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetNative American Health Center Inc: $295,476 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINDIAN FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC OF GREAT FALLS INC: $294,476 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetTHE NATIVE PROJECT: $291,225 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $281,960 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHELENA INDIAN ALLIANCE INC: $281,878 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER: $275,076 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $274,569 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $260,407 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIVE AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $208,726 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH: $200,577 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $172,860 over 3y, 14% of budgetDENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SER: $164,053 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNATIVE DIRECTIONS INC: $157,121 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetBUTTE NATIVE WELLNESS CENTER: $148,565 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE: $145,269 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH COALITION INC: $131,491 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEVADA URBAN INDIANS INC: $130,066 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $123,975 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH INC: $121,605 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Indian Health & Services: $105,599 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES INC: $98,785 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $91,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $71,209 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $49,946 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER: $30,116 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS NATIVE HEALTH: $29,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefFirst Nations Develop…California Consortium…Montana Healthcare Fo…California Physicians…Montana Community Fou…Native American Devel…Kaiser Foundation Hos…American Cancer Socie…The California Wellne…Reach Out and Read IncNew Venture Fund
Direct ReliefCA29.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · First Nations Development Institute · California Consortium for Urban Indian Health · Montana Healthcare Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Native American Development Corporaton · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Cancer Society Inc · The California Wellness Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · New Venture Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Council of Urban Indian Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Council of Urban Indian Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 60%
  • Native American Lifelines Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Council of Urban Indian Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home