· Public charity
National Council of Urban Indian Health
The NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH (ncuih) is a national 501(c)(3) organization devoted to the support and development of quality, accessible, and culturally competent health services for american indians and alaska natives (ai/ans) living in urban settings.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $406,586 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $415,586 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $302k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALT LAKE | $93,100 |
| SAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER | $84,600 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $74,348 |
| FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE | $50,000 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES | $32,063 |
| HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC | $30,500 |
| FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT | $11,793 |
| NATIVE HEALTH | $8,500 |
| KANSAS CITY INDIAN CENTER | $8,126 |
| BAKERSFIELD AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT | $7,600 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH | $5,956 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $747k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $551k · revenue +1%
- FAFRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT4× · 2021–2024 · $444k · revenue +70%
- UIUrban Indian Center of Salt Lake4× · 2021–2024 · $327k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- UIURBAN INTER-TRIBAL CENTER TEXASone grant, 2021 · $240k
- TITUCSON INDIAN CENTERone grant, 2021 · $235k
- FHFRIENDSHIP HOUSEone grant, 2021 · $230k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern Indian Health Council is a Native American organization committed to protecting and improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of our American Indian Community. We provide a comprehensive range of wellness, health care,…
Established by the tribes to advocate as the united voice of federally recognized american indian and alaska native tribes, nihb seeks to reinforce tribal sovereignty, strengthen tribal health systems, secure resources, and build capacity…
To provide health services to eligible american indians in the service areas of Glenn and Yolo counties and portions of Colusa, Butte and Tehama counties. Medical and dental services are provided to the general community as well.
To help ensure the survival and healing of american indians and alaskan natives and the greater community by providing high quality, comprehensive health care and cultural services.
The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.
Mact health board provides medical outpatient, dental, and behavioral health services to native americans and other communities of alpine, mariposa, amador, calaveras, and tuolumne counties.
To elevate the health status of the American Indian people in our service area and all people in our communities to the highest level possible through a comprehensive system of preventive and therapeutic services.
Integrate community-based traditional knowledge into all facets of Native health care and education and to promote wellness and balance for Indigenous peoples.
Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.
To continually improve and maintain a comprehensive health care system to serve the needs and traditional values of our american indian community.
To continually nurture a balance of physical, mental, and spiritual well-being for indigent native americans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Native Project and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Tribal Emergency Management Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc ↗
- Who funds FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON ↗
- Who funds American Indian Health Service of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Native American Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIAN FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC OF GREAT FALLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIVE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds HELENA INDIAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds DENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL NATIONS HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BUTTE NATIVE WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA URBAN INDIANS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds American Indian Health & Services ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN LIFELINES INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST TRIBAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HEALTH CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · First Nations Development Institute · California Consortium for Urban Indian Health · Montana Healthcare Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Native American Development Corporaton · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Cancer Society Inc · The California Wellness Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · New Venture Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Council of Urban Indian Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Native American Lifelines Inc — 60% of income from government
- Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.