Loading…
· Public charity
National Council of Jewish Women
The Organization is a volunteer organization, inspired by Jewish values, working through a program of research, education, advocacy, and community service to improve the quality of life for women, children, and families striving to ensure individual rights and freedoms.
$14k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Health$33kHuman Services$33kFood & Nutrition$8kCivil Rights$7kOther$26k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
covidhealthcaredallasprimaryadultsyoungabuse
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Vickery Meadow Alliance$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Visiting Nurse Association Foundation
Promote Community Health Services
Health
2
Texas Forensic Nurse Examiners - Forensic
Through a coordinated community response The Forensic Center empowers victims, promotes healing & creates innovative & comprehensive solutions to fill gaps in victim services.
—
3
Vibrant Woman Mama Sana
Vibrant Woman-Mama Sana seeks to directly address the grave and racialized maternal and infant health disparities in the United States and to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes for communities of color in Central Texas.
Health
4
Arlington Life Shelter
The mission of Arlington Life Shelter is to promote self-sufficiency by providing shelter, employment programs and transitional services for North Texans impacted by homelessness.
Housing & Shelter
5
Fostering Family
To strengthen Houston's foster families and their communities through training and collaboration.
Community Improvement
6
Dallas Life Inc
Work with women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies. provides lay-counseling, education, medical services, and emotional & spiritual support at no cost.
Unclassified
7
Groundwork Dfw
Groundwork DFW's vision is to increase access to opportunity through data-driven community engagement. By applying the powerful combination of data analytics and grassroots outreach tactics, we strategically reach neighborhoods like no one…
Education
8
Houston Area Women's Center
To help those affected by domestic and sexual violence to move their lives forward.
Human Services
9
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc
To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
—
10
Family Compass
To build healthy families and a strong north texas community by preventing child abuse and neglect.
Crime & Legal
11
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Health
12
Women's Health and Family Planning
To ensure that everyone in Texas can access safe and high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Muslim Womens Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vickery Meadow Neighborhood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$32,500Human Services$32,500Other$26,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Civil Rights$7,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · America's Charities · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation National Council of Jewish Women funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Vickery Meadow Alliance.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~31 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 862521780 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Vickery Meadow Alliance, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 31 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to National Council of Jewish Women?
Find your warmest path to National Council of Jewish Women through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines