Skip to content

· Public charity

National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology

Digital promise is an independent, bipartisan nonprofit, authorized by congress in 2008 as the national center for research in advanced information and digital technologies through section 802 of the higher education opportunity act.

$27M
Granted FY2019
36
Grants FY2019
18
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$19MInternational$1.0MHuman Services$323kCommunity Improvement$70kEmployment$10kYouth Development$10kReligion$5k
02FY2019 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 36 grants below total $7,776,256, the rows itemized in this filing. The $26,528,581 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,752,325 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.6M
$100,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEARNING OVATIONS$3,721,888
MDRC$576,397
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$285,667
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$246,000
ALHAMBRA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT$228,000
FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS$205,000
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$180,000
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$180,000
UC IRVINE$131,304
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$125,000
DALLAS ISD$125,000
IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$125,000
NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS$123,000
REYNOLDS SCHOOL DISTRICT$114,000
IRVING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$111,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $358k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CR: $5k → 14%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $10k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $10k → 23%TIDES CENTERMAKER ED INITIATIVE: $323k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 42 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2019, 24 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
39

Total granted

$15M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+40%

Still filing today

14%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +511%
  • MDRC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $769k · revenue +29%
  • MA
    MATER ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • VU
    VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $2.0M
  • RI
    RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $286k
  • UD
    US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $252k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for the Future of Learning

The Center for the Future of Learning empowers a vibrant learning ecosystem connecting communities to create future-focused solutions for today while sharing effective practices to advance tomorrow. The Center for the Future of Learning…

Education
2
Ilearn Collaborative

ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…

Education
3
The National Center on Education and the Economy

The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.

Public Benefit
4
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
5
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
6
Edvance College

To create an ecosystem of equity-driven teachers, leaders, and change agents working to transform the future of our communities. the organization was built with early childhood educators at the core. to reimagine higher education that…

Education
7
The Leadership Academy Inc

Harnessing leadership as a lever for change, we partner with education leaders through professional learning and coaching to transform schools and accelerate learning for all students.

Education
8
New Teacher Center

New teacher center (ntc) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving outcomes for all students by accelerating teacher and school leader effectiveness. from preschool through high school, (continued on schedule o)

Education
9
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
10
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
11
Leading Educators Inc

Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.

Education
12
Digital Leaders Now

Transform education by focusing on upskilling teachers with advanced teaching tools and best practices in emerging fields like cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Multicultural Career Intern Program; the most unlike its peers is Compass Cbs Fundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEARNING OVATIONS: $6,057,328 · OtherLEARNING OVATIONSVISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,000,000 · OtherVISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCAJON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $593,326 · Other+72 more: $8,797,949 · Other+72 moreDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $1,000,000 · InternationalFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $205,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $161,700 · EducationMATER ACADEMY INC: $150,000 · EducationPropel Schools Inc: $125,000 · EducationCARLYNTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $93,048 · Education+6 more: $65,000 · EducationMDRC: $768,795 · Employment+1 more: $5,000 · EmploymentTIDES CENTER: $323,075 · Human Services+4 more: $34,750 · Human ServicesICAFUND: $10,000 · Community ImprovementARIZONA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOMPASS CBS FUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSTREETCODE ACADEMY: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$17,448,603International$1,000,000Education$799,748Employment$773,795Human Services$357,825Community Improvement$20,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $1,000,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMDRC: $768,795 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $323,075 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $205,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $161,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMATER ACADEMY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPropel Schools Inc: $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCARLYNTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $93,048 over 2y, 77% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ADVANCED INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPropel Charter School-Northside: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMULTICULTURAL CAREER INTERN PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP Innovations: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCity Center for Collaborative Learning: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAFUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENTUCKY VALLEY EDUCATIONAL COOPERATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTREETCODE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEARNLAUNCH INC: $9,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHROUGHLINE LEARNING: $9,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Learning Network: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGOODWILL OF NORTH GEORGIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VETERANS ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEBRASKA ENTERPRISE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVIRGINIA PENINSULA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds MATER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Propel Schools Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Digital Promise GlobalDC60.9× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Digital Promise Global · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Round It Up America Inc · Good Sports Inc · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · The George W Bush Foundation · I Car Education Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Mater Academy Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology?

Find your warmest path to National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology’s filings →

More from the funding graph