Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Association for the Education of Young Children

Naeyc promotes high-quality early learning for each and every child, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$998kEducation$719kPublic Benefit$300kCivil Rights$300kPhilanthropy$70kCrime & Legal$60kEnvironment$50kOther$594k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $25,833 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $69,361 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $43,528 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST OHIO ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN$15,000
WASHINGTON DC ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN$10,833
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $998k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OREGON ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN: $10k → 8%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $55k → 16%CHILDCARE AWARE OF AMERICA: $298k → 7%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $10k → 16%CHILDCARE AWARE OF AMERICA: $281k → 7%CHILDCARE AWARE OF AMERICA: $248k → 7%CHILDCARE AWARE OF AMERICA: $98k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
WI
NY
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 18 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$2.8M
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $300k · revenue +67%
  • START EARLY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $290k · revenue +73%
  • IA
    IOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $105k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • MS
    MBST SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $56k
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%
  • MA
    MD ASSOC FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $36k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association for the Education of Young Children

Naeyc promotes high-quality early learning for each and every child, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research. we advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate, and…

Education
2
California Association for the Education of Young Children

CAEYC envisions a respected professional work force providing developmentally appropriate and culturally sensitive, high-quality, early care and education for all young children achieved through research, education, professional…

Education
3
Early Care and Education Association

Support for Child Care Centers and professionals in the Upper Valley Region of New Hampshire and Vermont.

Education
4
Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children

It is the collective responsibility of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) of the Council for Exceptional Children to center the needs and realities of those who are most negatively impacted by systemic inequity. See Schedule O for full…

Human Services
5
Vt Association for the Education of Young Children

The vermont association for the education of young children (vtaeyc) advances equity and excellence in early childhood education with early childhood educators as our foundation. as a membership organization, we provide resources and…

Education
6
Connecticut Association for the Education of Young Children Inc

To enhance the care, education, and development of Connecticut's young children, in the context of family, and community; and to support the professionals who care for them. CTAEYC provides training to increase the competencies of…

—
7
Ohio Assn for the Education of Young Children

Membership organization for early care and education professionals in ohio.

—
8
Nebraska Association for the Education of Young Children Inc

Promote professional development activities; advocate for issues relating to children and families; serve as a resource for local affiliates and for other agencies involved in working with and for children & families; disseminate…

Youth Development
9
North Carolina Early Education Coalition

Act as an organization to provide education, information distribution, training, newsletters, fact sheets, and other materials to educate communities about the importance of high quality childhood education, especially for infants and…

Education
10
Pennsylvania Child Care Association

The pennsylvania child care association (pacca), a statewide non-profit organization, exists to be a strong and effective advocate for high-quality early care and education (ece) programs, and to give leadership and support to those…

Human Services
11
Early Years Inc

Early years leads efforts to strengthen accessible and affordable quality early care and education by providing support for families, communities and the workforce. early years 's primary purpose is to provide services, research and…

—
12
Early Childhood Learning Educa Assessment Resource Network Inc

Providing education & support for those working in early education and child care. ec learn inspires & equips families, professionals, and community learders to prioritize early childhood education for a

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Association for the Education of Young Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children At Risk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA — $923,250 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICAADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $65,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesIOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $104,682 · EducationIOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE E…Pennsylvania Association for the Education of Young Children — $97,500 · EducationPennsylvania Association f…New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children — $96,800 · EducationNew Mexico Association for…Arizona Association for the Education of Young Children — $92,000 · EducationArizona Association for th…MAINE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $90,000 · EducationMAINE ASSOCIATION FOR THE …Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children — $82,300 · EducationIdaho Association for the …SOUTH DAKOTA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $75,000 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA ASSOCIATION F…MD ASSOC FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $35,500 · EducationNevada Association for the Education of Young Children — $25,000 · Education+2 more — $19,833 · EducationSTART EARLY — $290,000 · OtherSTART EARLYWISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $99,886 · OtherWISCONSIN EARLY CHILD…MBST SOLUTIONS — $55,945 · OtherMBST SOLUTIONSNEW YORK ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $34,800 · OtherNEW YORK ASSOCIATION …MONTANA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATI ON OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $20,000 · Other+8 more — $93,250 · Other+8 moreBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $300,000 · Public BenefitBIPARTISAN …CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $300,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR …RODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE — $35,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 · PhilanthropyChildren At Risk — $60,000 · Crime & LegalSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $50,000 · Environment
Human Services$998,250Education$718,615Other$593,881Public Benefit$300,000Civil Rights$300,000Philanthropy$70,000Crime & Legal$60,000Environment$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA — $923,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $300,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSTART EARLY — $290,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $104,682 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $99,886 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPennsylvania Association for the Education of Young Children — $97,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children — $96,800 over 4y, 11% of budgetArizona Association for the Education of Young Children — $92,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMAINE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $90,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetIdaho Association for the Education of Young Children — $82,300 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $65,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetChildren At Risk — $60,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $34,800 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNevada Association for the Education of Young Children — $25,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMONTANA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATI ON OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $20,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetIndiana Association for the Education of Young Children Inc — $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Jersey Association for the Education of Young Children — $16,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN (DCAEYC) — $10,833 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetOREGON ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHIL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $6,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGeorgia Association for the Education OF YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $6,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliance for Early Su…WK Kellogg FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy AllianceDC21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance · WK Kellogg Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Association for the Education of Young Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Oregon Association for the Education of Young Chil — 30% of income from government
  • Rodel Charitable Foundation - De — 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines