Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nathan and Shelly Sarkisian Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$132kFood & Nutrition$60kInternational$37kHousing & Shelter$14kCrime & Legal$11kEnvironment$10kEducation$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Loaves Fishes$29,000
Immanual Lutheran Church$25,934
2nd Harvest of Silicon Valley$20,000
Family Supportive Housing$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
KQED$2,006
Arthritis Foundation$500
Girls on the Run of the Bay Area$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family Supportive Housing: $10k → 8%Family Supportive Housing: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MA
CA
UT
TN
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 15 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$258k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+32%

Still filing today

53%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
InternationalHealthReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +45%
  • FL
    FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +110%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -32%
  • NG
    NEW GENERATIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
2
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
3
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
4
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
7
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Fresh Start Women's Foundation

The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cityteam Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Girls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Immanual Lutheran Church: $114,934 · OtherImmanual Lutheran ChurchLoaves Fishes: $39,500 · OtherLoaves Fishes2nd Harvest of Silicon Valley: $20,000 · Other2nd Harvest of Silicon ValleyWorld Concern: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,150 · OtherSARATOGA FEDERATED CHURCH: $9,500 · Other+10 more: $28,495 · Other+10 moreTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $9,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $9,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $5,000 · InternationalFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCHOLARMATCH INC: $9,000 · EducationNEW GENERATIONS: $4,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $2,000 · ReligionKQED INC: $4,506 · Arts & Culture
Other$233,579International$23,500Human Services$13,500Youth Development$11,000Education$9,000Religion$6,000Arts & Culture$4,506

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $4,506 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GENERATIONS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARMATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GENERATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nathan and Shelly Sarkisian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nathan and Shelly Sarkisian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nathan and Shelly Sarkisian’s filings →

More from the funding graph