Skip to content
Nash Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nash Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
198
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$25MHealth$14MPhilanthropy$7.4MReligion$7.3MInternational$7.1MArts & Culture$6.4MHuman Services$6.1MEducation$4.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 198 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k133 grants · $2.7M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+12 grants · $6.2M
$20,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$1,500,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$1,000,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$600,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$500,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$500,000
THE SHEFA SCHOOL$400,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$360,000
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$300,000
MY KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC$285,000
FRIENDS OF BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS & DES$250,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$250,000
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$250,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$227,500
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$150,000
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY: $50k → 20%SHOREFRONT JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $60k → 20%SHOREFRONT JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $60k → 20%SHOREFRONT JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $50k → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $50k → 20%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $250k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $250k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $180k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $150k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $150k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $125k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $125k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $125k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $125k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $100k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $75k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $75k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $75k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $60k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $250k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $250k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $100k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $85k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $85k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $65k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $65k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $65k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $65k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $50k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $180k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $63k → 17%DOROT: $60k → 17%DOROT: $50k → 17%DOROT: $50k → 17%DOROT: $50k → 17%DOROT: $50k → 17%DOROT: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
WV
MD
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51M · 166 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

166 repeat relationships: 101 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

166
58

Total granted

$51M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+2%

Still filing today

75%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10M · revenue +39%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +46%
  • SS
    SHEFA SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $198k · revenue 0%
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL-NORTH AMERICA CO
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • OI
    ONWARD ISRAEL USA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
The Jerusalem Connection
—
6
Jewish Institute for the Blind (Jerusalem) Inc

To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.

International
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
9
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
10
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
11
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
12
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jerome Robbins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

169 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 169 of the 242 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
166/169
Grantees still filing
118/169
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,115,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT M…SHEFA SCHOOL: $3,300,000 · EducationSHEFA SCHOOL+14 more: $986,500 · Education+14 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $6,585,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,609,696 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT…+7 more: $688,000 · Philanthropy+7 moreM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM INC: $1,495,000 · OtherM Y KEREN HASHLUCHIM …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JAFFA INSTITUTE: $660,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF J…MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $600,000 · OtherMESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI…MECHON HADAR: $587,575 · OtherMECHON HADAR+83 more: $7,264,963 · Other+83 moreMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $2,770,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN …THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,152,900 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH CO…DOROT INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesDOROT INC+23 more: $2,401,300 · Human Services+23 moreFRIENDS OF BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND DESIGNS INC: $1,700,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …THE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,530,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $775,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FR…THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $550,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGI…THE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY INC: $254,500 · Arts & Culture+22 more: $1,046,100 · Arts & Culture+22 moreBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,430,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGH…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $815,000 · InternationalThe Ameri…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $195,000 · InternationalONE FAMILY FUND: $160,000 · InternationalALEPH SOCIETY INC: $160,000 · InternationalITREK INC: $160,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $158,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $150,000 · International+17 more: $1,186,150 · International+17 moreNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,900,000 · Health+9 more: $539,600 · Health
Education$14,401,500Philanthropy$9,883,196Other$10,607,538Human Services$6,849,200Arts & Culture$5,855,600International$4,414,150Health$3,439,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $6,585,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $3,300,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,900,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $2,770,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,609,696 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND DESIGNS INC: $1,700,000 over 5y, 94% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,530,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,430,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,152,900 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $815,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $775,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $550,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDOROT INC: $525,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNLI USA INC: $395,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $350,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $310,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $295,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetONETABLE INC: $255,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY INC: $254,500 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF CANARSIE INC: $240,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetFOOTSTEPS INC: $227,300 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $220,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $199,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $198,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $195,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetProject Kesher: $175,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHOREFRONT JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $170,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND: $160,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetREUT USA: $160,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC: $160,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetITREK INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $158,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $152,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INC: $150,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $148,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetThe Shalem Foundation: $145,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF NETWORK UKRAINE: $138,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetHUNTER HILLEL FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetProject Ezra: $130,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $130,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC: $125,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $120,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetKINGS BAY YM-YWHA INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND DESIGNS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds NLI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds ONETABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF CANARSIE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTSTEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Kesher ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOREFRONT JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundUnited Jewish Appeal-…Jewish Community Foun…Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Community Fede…FjcJewish Federation of …The Russell Berrie Fo…The Shimon Ben Joseph…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Jewish Federation…Seed the Dream Founda…
Jewish Communal FundNY64× affinity85 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Russell Berrie Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Seed the Dream Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nash Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nash Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Services of Greenwich: 41% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • National Center for Jewish Filminc: 4% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nash Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nash Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 242 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nash Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home