Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Narrow Gate - a Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$3.5MYouth Development$554kAnimals$80kHealth$74kHuman Services$17kInternational$15kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$9,210
Median grant
2
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROAD TO THE TOP$10,000
THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE$9,210
FOOTHILLS CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
IN
CA
CO
TN
SC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 15 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$4.2M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+12%

Still filing today

33%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $258k · revenue +19% · 35% of their budget
  • TA
    THRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +82%
  • DR
    DANNY & RONS RESCUE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +287%

Funded once

  • GE
    Gush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -48%
  • HP
    HERITAGE POINT OF WARREN
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • EW
    EAGLES WINGS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Life Inc

The mission of rescue life is to save the lives of wild, farm, and domestic animals which include horses, pigs, donkeys, llamas, zebras, alpacas,and dogs. the mission includes providing care, shelter, and adoption services. rescue life…

Animals
2
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

5
Rosemary Farm Sanctuary Inc

At rosemary farm, our mission is to rescue horses in need and protect them for life. we save equines from slaughter, neglect and abuse. while adoption is not our focus, select horses may be available to the right home, if right for the…

Animals
6
The Puppy Rescue Mission Inc

Animal rescue & welfare: getting pets to shelter, veterinary care and transporting both within the usa and to the usa from abroad

Animals
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
God's Dogs Rescue

Animal rescue

Human Services
9
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

11
Clean International Inc

Clean international partners globally to deliver innovative solutions, education, and engagement to protect and provide water worldwide.

International
12
International Guiding Eyes Inc Dba Guide Dogs of America

The organizations mission is to transform lives through partnerships with service dogs.the organization provides professionally trained, expertly matched service dogs and personalized instruction in their care and use to people who are…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Road to the Top Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCK CHURCH SD - POINT LOMA — $3,245,000 · OtherROCK CHURCH SD - POINT LOMAHOPE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $293,000 · OtherHOPE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY+18 more — $331,610 · Other+18 moreHOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $258,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,200 · Youth DevelopmentTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $40,000 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $37,500 · AnimalsGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman — $12,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel — $10,000 · InternationalGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · InternationalROAD TO THE TOP INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · PhilanthropyCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO — $1,000 · PhilanthropyVinceremos Riding Center Inc — $5,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$3,869,610Youth Development$261,200Animals$77,500International$27,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Philanthropy$7,000Health$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $258,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $40,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $37,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROAD TO THE TOP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY — $9,210 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE HOOVES RESCUE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE
  • Who funds Gush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds ROAD TO THE TOP INC
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
  • Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Vinceremos Riding Center Inc
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds LITTLE HOOVES RESCUE INC
  • Who funds CENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Narrow Gate - a Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Narrow Gate - a Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Narrow Gate - a Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph