· Public charity
Nareit Foundation
Making grants to charitable, educational, and other organizations qualified and recognized as exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code; taking steps to promote and advance social responsibility in the real estate investment trust industry; and sponsoring educational conferences or publishing…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOREHOUSE COLLEGE INC | $250,000 |
| KUNIA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $127,000 |
| COALITION FOR NONPROFIT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $125,000 |
| NAF | $100,000 |
| PARADIGM FOR PARITY INC | $100,000 |
| PROJECT DESTINED | $100,000 |
| BUILDING MARKETS LTD | $100,000 |
| THE EMPIFY FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| ROBERT A TOIGO FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| PROJECT VISION HAWAII | $80,000 |
| IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC | $54,000 |
| RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| PROJECT HAWAII INC | $50,000 |
| MOLOKAI AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE | $27,000 |
| FORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY | $23,340 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RAROBERT A TOIGO FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +17%
- CHCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $148k · revenue +53%
- CBCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +217%
Funded once
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAIIgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +59%
- HAHousing and Land Enterprise of Hawaiigraduatedone grant, 2020 · $195k · revenue +153% · 71% of their budget
- HIHAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $180k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission is to develop, own and manage multi-family rental communities serving families earning 20 to 80 percent of median income. the organization will assist its target families to become more self sufficient through the provision of…
The mission of the organization (mhah) is to develop, own and manage multi-family rental communities serving families earning 20 to 80 percent of median income. mhah will assist its target families to become more self sufficient through…
The organization is incorporated to support the preservation, rehabilitation and development of, and access to, affordable housing, and to support economic opportunities for lower-income families.
Create successful homeowners by providing classes and homeownership coaching to prepare for the purchase process and have access to buyer resources. post-purchase support is avaliable to have a resource to address concers as a homeowner.…
To secure and preserve a permanent supply of affordable housing alternatives for low and moderate income households in maui county.
Direct services and advocacy for persons with developmental and intellectual disabilities.
To provide and promote private sector support and expertise for balanced growth in hawai'i county in partnership with federal, state, county and private resources.
Through the use of organization resources, combined with volunteer labor, build decent, simple, affordable housing or make critical repairs to existing housing. new homeowners are provided an affordable mortgage with very little or no…
The corporation shall perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of eah inc, a related california public benefit corporation, by being dedicated to promoting the development and preservation of decent housing…
To develop and expand opportunities available to low-income individuals to own, manage, operate and gain employment in business enterprises; to provide low-income and physically and mentally disadvantaged individuals with housing…
Poi: providing opportunities and inspiration to enable low-income individuals or families to achieve self-reliance. hcap's mission is very deeply rooted in its responsiveness to the community and its needs. it is hcap's belief and…
The council for native hawaiian advancement (cnha) is a member-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to enhance the cultural, economic, political, and community development of native hawaiians.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Hawaii and the most unlike its peers is Molokai Affordable Housing Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DESTINED INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERT A TOIGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARADIGM FOR PARITY ↗
- Who funds Housing and Land Enterprise of Hawaii ↗
- Who funds HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HomeAid Hawaii ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EAH Inc ↗
- Who funds ARC OF MAUI COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KAUAI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds KUNIA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND POLITICS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING MARKETS LTD ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE 500 INC ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds THE NASDAQ ENTREPRENEURIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NAF ↗
- Who funds U S Black Chamber of Commerce EDC ↗
- Who funds THE AHLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VISION HAWAII ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY ASSETS INC ↗
- Who funds RESIDENTIAL YOUTH SERVICES & EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds MOLOKAI AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HHOC HOUSING AND LAND TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Aloha United Way Inc · Atherton Family Foundation · J Watumull Fund · Cooke Foundation Limited · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Hawai'i Pacific Health Group Return · The Queen's Medical Center · Aloha Harvest · Keith and Polly Steiner Family Foundation · Kakatu Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nareit Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nareit Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nareit Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.