Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nancy Malcomson Connable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$58kArts & Culture$40kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$10kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$500
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AACORN$2,000
SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVANCY$2,000
WELLSPRING-CORI TERRY AND DANCERS$2,000
YWCA OF KALAMAZOO$2,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,500
BALLET ARTS ENSEMBLE$1,500
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,500
ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO$1,500
PRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP$1,500
KALAMAZOO NATURE CENTER$1,500
RIVERKEEPER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$115k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+24%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    Wellspring-Cori Terry and Dancers
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +57%
  • PL
    PRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +111%
  • KN
    Kalamazoo Nature Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +254%

Funded once

  • PC
    PARK CLUB HISTORIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -74%
  • HS
    HENRY STREET SETTLEMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +37%
  • PS
    Primary Stages Company Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
2
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
3
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
4
Kirkland Center of the Performing Arts Dba Kirkland Performance Center

Kpc provides a gathering place where people come together to express themselves creatively, exchange ideas, share culture and connect with one another

Arts & Culture
5
Kitchen Theatre Company Inc

In its intimate performance space, the Kitchen Theatre Company (KTC) creates professional theatre that challenges the intellect, excites the imagination, informs and entertains. KTC nurtures a community of diverse artists and brings…

Arts & Culture
6
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
7
Cornerstone Theater Company

Cornerstone theater company collaborates with communities. our work reflects complexity, disrupts assumptions, welcomes difference, and amplifies joy.

Arts & Culture
8
Bristol Riverside Theatre Co Inc

To engage audiences and artists alike with exceptional performances, inspired writing and superior productions that motivate us to think harder, to feel more deeply, to laugh more fully and to reflect on ourselves and the world in which we…

Arts & Culture
9
The Calumet Theatre Company

The Calumet Theatre Company is committed to offering a quality entertainment experience that provides diverse cultural and artistic opportunities while preserving the historic character of the theater.

Arts & Culture
10
Kaatsbaan International Dance Center Inc

The mission of kaatsbaan cultural park is to provide an extraordinary environment for cultural innovation and excellence. as both an incubator for creativity and presenter for diverse world-class artists in dance, theater, music, film,…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jungle Theater

See schedule o.the jungle's mission is to create courageous, resonant theater that challenges, entertains, and sparks expansive conversation. the jungle's vision is to be a neighborhood theater with national impact, indispensable to our…

Arts & Culture
12
La Crosse Community Theatre

To honor and celebrate our rich theatrical heritage while establishing a sustainable foundation for the years to come.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joyce Theater Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverkeeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INCKalamazoo Nature Center: $10,000 · EnvironmentKalamazoo Nature CenterNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCRIVERKEEPER INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INCYWCA OF KALAMAZOO: $12,500 · OtherYWCA OF KALAMAZOOBALLET ARTS ENSEMBLE INC: $10,000 · OtherBALLET ARTS ENSEMBLE INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYAACORN: $7,500 · OtherAACORNKalamazoo Civic Theatre: $2,000 · OtherWellspring-Cori Terry and Dancers: $14,000 · Arts & CultureWellspring-Cori Terry an…ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $10,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER …PARK CLUB HISTORIC FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePARK CLUB HISTORIC FOUND…+2 more: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $500 · Human ServicesCAUSE CELEBRE: $500 · Health
Environment$49,000Other$40,500Arts & Culture$27,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$500Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWellspring-Cori Terry and Dancers: $14,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKalamazoo Nature Center: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET ARTS ENSEMBLE INC: $10,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CLUB HISTORIC FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAUSE CELEBRE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN LAND CONSERVENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring-Cori Terry and Dancers ↗
  • Who funds PRETTY LAKE VACATION CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Nature Center ↗
  • Who funds BALLET ARTS ENSEMBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK CLUB HISTORIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Civic Theatre ↗
  • Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAUSE CELEBRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Burdick-Thorne FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Jim Gilmore Jr Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Peregrine-Huff Foundation · Preston S and Barbara J Parish Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nancy Malcomson Connable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nancy Malcomson Connable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nancy Malcomson Connable Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Nancy Malcomson Connable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nancy Malcomson Connable’s filings →

    More from the funding graph