Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$62kArts & Culture$56kHealth$42kHuman Services$12kFood & Nutrition$9kCrime & Legal$4kReligion$4kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Music Conservatory of Westchester$13,165
Individual grant recipient$10,000
College Money Matters$5,000
Feeding Westchester$2,000
Planned ParenthoodHudsonPeconic$1,500
Access Supports for Living$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Bellarmine College$1,000
Larchmont Temple$1,000
Louis Wolk Jewish Comm Ctr$500
Yonkers Partners in Education$500
Clay Art Center$500
NY Botanical Gardens$435
Sheldrake Environmental Center$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Access Supports for Living: $2k → 14%FamilyKind: $7k → 17%Family Kind LTD: $3k → 17%Family Kind LTD: $250 → 17%At Home on the Sound Inc: $150 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 47 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
58

Total granted

$181k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+29%

Still filing today

45%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue +11%
  • TM
    THE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $17k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITYgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
50/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $30,010 · OtherGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientColumbia College: $15,000 · OtherColumbia CollegeIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPhilharmonic Society: $8,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,060 · Other+76 more: $65,760 · Other+76 morePACE UNIVERSITY: $16,500 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SO…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVE…College Money Matters Inc: $5,000 · EducationCollege Money Ma…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,710 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UN…+6 more: $2,959 · Education+6 moreTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $24,775 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSIC CONS…NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $4,012 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLI…WNET: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $3,385 · Arts & Culture+10 moreFAMILYKIND LTD: $9,990 · Human ServicesACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $150 · Human ServicesMARCH OF DIMES INC: $5,502 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $1,500 · HealthFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $400 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $1,400 · Civil RightsFAIRVOTE: $100 · Civil RightsORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$163,530Education$37,669Arts & Culture$33,672Human Services$11,640Health$7,452Civil Rights$1,500Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $30,010 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $24,775 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILYKIND LTD: $9,990 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $5,502 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Money Matters Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $4,012 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,545 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $1,210 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $854 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLAY ART CENTER INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMELIN THEATRE: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELDRAKE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLARCHMONT MANOR PARK SOCIETY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOOD DISORDERS SUPPORT GROUP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSWESTCHESTER INC: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE OUTREACH INC: $55 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND FARM INC: $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILYKIND LTD ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds College Money Matters Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds MAMARONECK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds My Sisters Place Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY29.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Glff Inc · St Faith's House Foundation · The Toby and Nataly Ritter Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · Artswestchester Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · K & M Weisburgh Charitable Fund Inc · Charles S Raizen Foundation Inc · Gary and Evelyn Trachten Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman’s filings →

More from the funding graph