Skip to content

· Public charity

Naf

NAF solves some of the biggest challenges facing education and the economy by bringing education, business, and community leaders together to transform the high school experience.

$684k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.9MEmployment$200kInternational$150kScience & Tech$46kArts & Culture$45kYouth Development$38kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $403,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $683,641 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $280,641 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $235k
$12,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
READY CT$150,000
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$85,000
MILWAUKEE BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS$26,000
JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL$24,000
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$23,000
JACKSON-REED PARENT TEACHER STUDENT ORGANIZATION$21,000
FOREST MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,000
SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,000
COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$11,000
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
BROWARD PRINCIPALS AND ASSISTANTS ASSOCIATION$9,000
ELVIRA M COLN NEGRN CONSEJO ESCOLAR$8,000
MIDDLETOWN EXTRA CLASSROOM ACTIVITY FUNDS$6,000
REEDY CREEK ROBOTICS BOOSTERS INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIT COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTEL: $46k → 8%GLOBAL INTITIATIVES: $25k → 6%DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $220k → 14%DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $200k → 14%COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $36k → 10%SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $100k → 11%SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY FL: $100k → 13%BROWARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $125k → 13%MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPT OF CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION: $100k → 15%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $505k → 21%JENNINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $59k → 11%UWM FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 17%READY CT: $150k → 11%MIT COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LABORATORY: $46k → 8%GLOBAL INTITIATIVES: $25k → 6%CAMPAIGN FOR BLACK MALE ACHIEVEMENT: $38k → 17%DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $80k → 14%DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $100k → 14%SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $100k → 11%SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY FL: $75k → 13%BROWARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $90k → 13%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $100k → 21%JENNINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $43k → 11%UWM FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 17%READYCT: $150k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%GLOBAL INTITIATIVES: $25k → 6%DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $48k → 14%DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $75k → 14%SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY FL: $60k → 13%SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA: $60k → 13%MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CTE PROGRAM: $75k → 15%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $85k → 21%MILWAUKEE BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS: $26k → 17%READY CT: $150k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $60k → 14%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $75k → 21%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $65k → 8%SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA: $60k → 15%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $60k → 21%DFW TECHNOLOGY & EDUCATION COUNCIL: $60k → 14%MAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 15%MAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INC: $41k → 15%DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $118k → 14%MAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSC: $26k → 15%FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $200k → 14%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $29k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Naf’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Naflessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 24 repeat orgs$476k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$4.8M
$367k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    READYCT INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $450k · revenue +230%
  • FP
    FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $212k · revenue +16%
  • DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue ×19

Funded once

  • DE
    DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $118k · revenue +61%
  • DS
    DFW SEMICONDUCTOR & TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • TR
    Technology Review Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $46k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community College Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

The mission of the community college preparatory academy public charter school is to provide the education and skills development to empower and prepare under-credited adults for postsecondary educational success, viable employment and…

Education
2
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
3
Citybridge Foundation
Health
4
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
5
Strategic Education Research Partnership Institute

The strategic education research partnership generates innovative, scalable solutions to our schools' most pressing problems through sustained collaborations among researchers, practitioners, and designers. we work to increase equity,…

Science & Tech
6
Literacy Design Collaborative Inc

Seeks to ensure that every student in america graduates from (continued on schedule o) high school with the literacy skills necessary for success in college and career. ldc is a teacher-created instructional design system that transforms…

Education
7
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
8
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
9
Math for America Dc

To ensure excellence in mathematics teaching in DC public and public charter schools by recruiting, training and retaining talented mathematics teachers over a five-year period.

—
10
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
11
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
12
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dc Public Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Porterville Pathways Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $740,000 · OtherDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICTDALLAS ISD: $386,400 · OtherDALLAS ISDMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $285,000 · OtherMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $264,973 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $261,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLSOrange County Public Schools: $235,000 · OtherOrange County Public SchoolsGLOBAL INITIATIVES INC: $175,000 · OtherGLOBAL INITIATIVES INCCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS: $175,000 · OtherCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS+22 more: $583,680 · Other+22 moreDC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $461,400 · EducationDC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDREADYCT INC: $450,000 · EducationREADYCT INCBroward Education Foundation Inc: $215,000 · EducationBroward Education Foundation IncFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $212,000 · EducationFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INCMAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INC: $132,000 · EducationMAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INCDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $118,250 · EducationDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College Fund: $70,500 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Education+7 more: $161,500 · Education+7 moreSOUTHWEST FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $200,000 · EmploymentTechnology Review Inc: $45,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,106,053Education$1,990,650Employment$200,000Arts & Culture$45,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $461,400 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetREADYCT INC: $450,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $215,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $212,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL INITIATIVES INC: $175,000 over 7y, 78% of budgetMAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INC: $132,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $118,250 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $70,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $45,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTechnology Review Inc: $45,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $42,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON-REED PARENT TEACHER STUDENT ORGANIZATION: $21,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetPORTERVILLE PATHWAYS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetOlympic High School Foundation: $12,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetMULTICULTURAL CAREER INTERN PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWoodrow Wilson High School Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBroward Principals And Assistants Association Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds READYCT INC ↗
  • Who funds Broward Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGNET EDUCATIONAL CHOICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Technology Review Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR BLACK MALE ACHIEVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON-REED PARENT TEACHER STUDENT ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds PORTERVILLE PATHWAYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Olympic High School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NYC ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST)NH31.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Share Our Strength · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Good Sports Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Project Lead the Way Inc · Digital Promise Global · Save the Music Foundation · The George W Bush Foundation · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naf funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naf. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 61%
  • Readyct Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Naf’s filings →

More from the funding graph