Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nadon Trust Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$72kEnvironment$46kRecreation & Sports$27kHealth$23kCommunity Improvement$16kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$15kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,356
Median grant
5
States reached
$568k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HECKSCHER MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
THE CAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC$2,356
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING$2,356
Save the Children$2,356
MAGIC CANOE$2,356
FOOD OF LIFECOMIDA DE VIDA FOOD PANTRY$2,356
PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC$2,356
Baltimore Hunger Project$2,356
MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST$2,356
Unitarian Church of All Souls$2,353
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $3k → 9%Baltimore Hunger Project: $2k → 11%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $3k → 9%Baltimore Hunger Project: $2k → 11%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 13 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$217k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-5%

Still filing today

69%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HECKSCHER MUSEUM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +59%
  • CF
    CAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +84%
  • Maine Coast Heritage Trust
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SOFT POWER HEALTH TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -5%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • PE
    PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
Susquehanna Heritage Corporation

As a designated national and state heritage area, susquehanna heritage corporation works to raise awareness and appreciation of the cultural and economic value of the susquehanna riverlands, and preserve, enhance and celebrate the area's…

Community Improvement
3
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
4
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
5
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
6
The Commons Inc

To partner with individuals and organizations to access, organize, and share data that inspires action that restores our environment.

—
7
New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc

The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.

—
8
The Potomac Conservancy Inc

Potomac conservancy safeguards the land and waters of the potomac river and its tributaries and connects people to this national treasure.

Environment
9
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
10
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
11
Westminster Canterbury On Chesapeake Bay Foundation

To support the mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay

Health
12
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecotrust; the most unlike its peers is The Soft Power Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HECKSCHER MUSEUM: $71,856 · Arts & CultureHECKSCHER MUSEUMSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $15,752 · OtherSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INCECOTRUST: $14,032 · OtherECOTRUSTFOOD OF LIFECOMIDA DE VIDA FOOD PANTRY: $10,391 · OtherFOOD OF LIFECOMIDA DE VIDA FOOD P…THE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND: $9,902 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLANDMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING: $7,391 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERINGUNITARIAN CHURCH OF ALL SOULS: $4,798 · OtherUNITARIAN CHURCH OF ALL SOULSMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,000 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $2,372 · OtherCAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC: $26,833 · EnvironmentCAUMSETT FOUNDATION INCMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $24,472 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heritage TrustMagic Canoe: $7,391 · EnvironmentMagic CanoePORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $14,763 · Human ServicesPORT CHES…BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC: $4,801 · Human ServicesBALTIMORE…Save The Children Federation Inc: $4,801 · InternationalTHE SOFT POWER HEALTH TRUST: $3,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$71,856Other$67,638Environment$58,696Human Services$19,564International$4,801Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHECKSCHER MUSEUM: $71,856 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC: $26,833 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $24,472 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $15,752 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $14,763 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetECOTRUST: $14,032 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND: $9,902 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMagic Canoe: $7,391 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,801 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC: $4,801 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOFT POWER HEALTH TRUST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HECKSCHER MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CAUMSETT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ECOTRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST JOHNLAND ↗
  • Who funds Magic Canoe ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOFT POWER HEALTH TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nadon Trust Tw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nadon Trust Tw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nadon Trust Tw’s filings →

More from the funding graph