Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Nadon Trust Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
30%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,356
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 10
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$568k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 30% of the organizations Nadon Trust Tw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 27% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$26k0%
FY202410$27k30%
FY20239$29k22%
FY20229$33k22%
FY20217$27k0%
FY20209$32k33%
FY20196$25k0%
FY20186$27kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$72kEnvironment$46kRecreation & Sports$27kHealth$23kCommunity Improvement$16kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$15kReligion$7kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Nadon Trust Tw by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Heckscher Museum$71,85681%
Caumsett Foundation Inc$26,83381%
Maine Coast Heritage Trust$24,47280%
Strong City Baltimore Inc$15,75260%
Port Chester Carver Center Inc$14,76360%
Ecotrust$14,03250%
The Society of St Johnland$9,90260%
Magic Canoe$7,39131%
Save The Children Federation Inc$4,80120%
Baltimore Hunger Project LLC$4,80120%
Unitarian Church of All Souls$4,7982n/a
The Soft Power Health Trust$3,00010%
Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America$2,3721n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($21k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Nadon Trust Tw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeckscher Museum: $71,856 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCaumsett Foundation Inc: $26,833 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $24,472 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetStrong City Baltimore Inc: $15,752 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPort Chester Carver Center Inc: $14,763 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEcotrust: $14,032 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Society of St Johnland: $9,902 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMagic Canoe: $7,391 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,801 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Hunger Project LLC: $4,801 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Soft Power Health Trust: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nadon Trust Tw with peer funders

About Nadon Trust Tw

How much does Nadon Trust Tw give?
Nadon Trust Tw reported 10 grants totaling $26,201 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Nadon Trust Tw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (32%), Environment (20%), Recreation & Sports (12%).
Who are Nadon Trust Tw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Heckscher Museum ($72k), Caumsett Foundation Inc ($27k), Maine Coast Heritage Trust ($24k).
Does Nadon Trust Tw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 30% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Nadon Trust Tw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nadon Trust Tw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Nadon Trust Tw based?
Nadon Trust Tw is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nadon Trust Tw’s filings →

More from the funding graph