Skip to content

· Public charity

Nact Parent Inc

100% of nact parent, inc.'s charitable activities consist of supporting, benefiting, performing the functions of and assisting its supported organizations which consist of nact pine grove inc (nact, ein: 81-3572035) and nact somerset inc (ein 87-1776524) and any future corporation directly affiliated with nact parent all of which are or…

$252k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$928k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC (SCOPE)$50,000
CAMP FOR ALL KIDS$30,000
CAMP RONALD MCDONALD FOR GOOD TIMES$30,000
GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA$27,000
ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION$25,000
EXPERIENCE CAMPS$25,000
CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND$25,000
RCHP-AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (INTERFAITH-RISE)$25,000
JOURNEYS URGING MAMMOTH POSSILITIES INC (SCOTT FREE)$6,000
PROJECT MORRY$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND: $25k → 6%RCHP-AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (INTERFAITH-RISE): $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fantasy Camps for Kids
Recreation & Sports
2
The Camp At Sunshine Farm
Philanthropy
3
Camp Sonshine

To unlock and unleash kingdom builders by leveraging camp experiences to create a place to belong and become.

Youth Development
4
Project Camp Inc

Instilling inspiration and empowerment, while enhancing the lives of children with serious illnesses.

Health
5
Camp Quality Usa Inc

Our mission is to let kids with cancer be kids again by establishing and sustaining community-based camping and year-round support and activities for children with cancer and their families. these programs, offered without charge, provide…

—
6
Camp Rise Above Inc

Camp rise above provides life-changing camp programs for children and adults with serious illnesses, disabilities, and life challenges.

Recreation & Sports
7
Camp Sunshine At Sebago Lake Inc

Founded in 1984, camp sunshine provides retreats combining respite, recreation and support, while enabling hope and promoting joy, for children with life-threatening illnesses and their families through the various stages of a child's…

Recreation & Sports
8
Special Days Camps

Special Days Camps exists to provide a safe and memorable camping opportunity in a medically supervised environment for children who have experienced cancer, their siblings, and their families.

—
9
Care Camps Foundation

Care camps funds medically supervised pediatric oncology camps across the united states and canada to bring the healing power of community and the outdoors to children living with cancer and their families.

—
10
Discovery Camps Inc
Youth Development
11
Camp Canaan

To provide specialized outdoor experiences that encourage growth in faith, including deeper relationship with Jesus Christ and others, in the environment of summer camps, retreats, and advernture programs.

Youth Development
12
Camp Tuckabatchee Inc

To provide recreational activities to youth

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Lakes Burn Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Morry Properties Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
6/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INCCamp for All Kids: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentCamp for All KidsEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentEXPERIENCE CAMPSPROJECT MORRY PROPERTIES INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentReformed Church Of Highland Park - Affordable Housing Corp: $25,000 · Human ServicesReformed Church Of Hig…CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND I…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD …JOURNEYS URGING MAMMOTH POSSIBILITIES: $6,000 · OtherJOURNEYS URGING …GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $27,000 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL CAMPS…ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthALISA ANN R…
Youth Development$110,000Human Services$50,000Other$36,000Recreation & Sports$27,000Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCamp for All Kids: $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $27,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetReformed Church Of Highland Park - Affordable Housing Corp: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nact Parent Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nact Parent Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nact Parent Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nact Parent Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $405k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nact Parent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph