· Public charity
Nact Parent Inc
100% of nact parent, inc.'s charitable activities consist of supporting, benefiting, performing the functions of and assisting its supported organizations which consist of nact pine grove inc (nact, ein: 81-3572035) and nact somerset inc (ein 87-1776524) and any future corporation directly affiliated with nact parent all of which are or…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $187k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC (SCOPE) | $50,000 |
| CAMP FOR ALL KIDS | $30,000 |
| CAMP RONALD MCDONALD FOR GOOD TIMES | $30,000 |
| GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA | $27,000 |
| ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EXPERIENCE CAMPS | $25,000 |
| CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND | $25,000 |
| RCHP-AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (INTERFAITH-RISE) | $25,000 |
| JOURNEYS URGING MAMMOTH POSSILITIES INC (SCOTT FREE) | $6,000 |
| PROJECT MORRY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care camps funds medically supervised pediatric oncology camps across the united states and canada to bring the healing power of community and the outdoors to children living with cancer and their families.
To unlock and unleash kingdom builders by leveraging camp experiences to create a place to belong and become.
Camp For All transforms the world for children and adults with challenging illnesses, disabilities, or special needs.
Camps For Kids' mission is to ensure that no Kansas City-area child is turned away from summer camp because of low income or physical, medical or developmental disability.
Comfort zone provides grieving children with a voice, a place and a community in which to heal, grow and lead more fulfilling lives.
To provide specialized outdoor experiences that encourage growth in faith, including deeper relationship with Jesus Christ and others, in the environment of summer camps, retreats, and advernture programs.
To offer experiences that model and nurture a culture of inclusion, grace and joy, through which people with and without disabilities can transcend barriers and value both their own gifts and the talents of others.
To connect young people to the outdoors, to others and to themselves.
Camp rise above provides life-changing camp programs for children and adults with serious illnesses, disabilities, and life challenges.
Instilling inspiration and empowerment, while enhancing the lives of children with serious illnesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Camps Africa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Morry Properties Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Camp for All Kids ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Reformed Church Of Highland Park - Affordable Housing Corp ↗
- Who funds CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nact Parent Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nact Parent Inc?
Find your warmest path to Nact Parent Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.