Skip to content

· Private foundation

N2 Stone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$925k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$350kHealth$300kReligion$250kHuman Services$150kCrime & Legal$150kPhilanthropy$110kArts & Culture$100kFood & Nutrition$25k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL KINGS$275,000
INSIDE OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION$150,000
YOUTH GUIDANCE$150,000
ARTYARD$100,000
SPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INC$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE$50,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
ALCHEMY INC$50,000
LANA I COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$25,000
HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSIDE OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 12%ALCHEMY INC: $50k → 13%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alchemy Community Therapy Center

Alchemy Community Therapy Center provides high-quality training, accesible psychedelic therapy, and innovative research, fostering effective and culturally-responsible mental health treatment for underserved communities.

Health
2
Old Skool Cafe

Old Skool Cafe is a faith-based violence prevention program, providing marketable and transferable employment skills to underserved youth. Our social enterprise restaurant is a hub for youth employment and positive change in the lives of…

Youth Development
3
Allies Place Inc
Education
4
The Youth Collective
Recreation & Sports
5
Kulture Klub Collaborative

The mission of Kulture Klub Collaborative is to provide a safe consistent space for youth experiencing homelessness to freely enjoy access to the arts. At KKC we believe that everyone is an artist. We expose, educate, and empower youth…

Arts & Culture
6
Lawndale Art & Performance Center

Lawndale is a multidisciplinary contemporary art center that engages Houston communities with exhibitions and programs that explore the aesthetic, critical, and social issues of our time.See Schedule O for continuation.For over 40 years,…

Arts & Culture
7
Urban Alchemy

To operate workforce programs in areas of civic engagement, urban street cleaning, & reentry services.

Community Improvement
8
The Center for Youth Services Inc

We partner with youth to realize their full potential, by creating opportunities, removing barriers, and promoting racial justice.

Human Services
9
Spark Youth

Spark-Y provides youth with action-oriented labs, in and out of the classroom, that empower young people with STEM education, job experience, and a place to test and grow sustainable solutions in our modern communities.

Human Services
10
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
11
New Pathways for Youth

At New Pathways for Youth, we are building a future where every young person can live their life with joy and purpose, confident in their ability to decide their own path. To make it happen, we are transforming the lives of youth by…

Crime & Legal
12
Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Artyard (Formerly Sprocket Arts). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH GUIDANCE: $150,000 · OtherYOUTH GUIDANCEALL KINGS PROJECT INC: $100,000 · OtherALL KINGS PROJECT INCSPIRITUAL ALLIANCE: $100,000 · OtherSPIRITUAL ALLIANCEHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE REBUILD FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE REBUILD FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE: $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESESPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INC: $50,000 · OtherSPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INCCORVINO FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherCORVINO FOUNDATIONTHE FARM TEAM: $25,000 · OtherAll Kings Project Inc: $275,000 · HealthAll Kings Project IncLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $25,000 · HealthLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH …INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRC…ALCHEMY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesALCHEMY INCMetropolitan Family Services: $50,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family…Youth Guidance: $150,000 · EducationYouth Guida…ARTYARD (FORMERLY SPROCKET ARTS): $100,000 · PhilanthropyARTYARD (…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII CO…
Other$610,000Health$300,000Human Services$250,000Education$150,000Philanthropy$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAll Kings Project Inc: $275,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetYouth Guidance: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetARTYARD (FORMERLY SPROCKET ARTS): $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetALCHEMY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization N2 Stone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from N2 Stone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on N2 Stone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph