Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

N2 Stone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$925k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Youth Development$350kHealth$300kReligion$250kHuman Services$150kCrime & Legal$150kPhilanthropy$110kArts & Culture$100kFood & Nutrition$25k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL KINGS$275,000
INSIDE OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION$150,000
YOUTH GUIDANCE$150,000
ARTYARD$100,000
SPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INC$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE$50,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
ALCHEMY INC$50,000
LANA I COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$25,000
HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSIDE OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 12%ALCHEMY INC: $50k → 13%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alchemy Community Therapy Center

Alchemy Community Therapy Center provides high-quality training, accesible psychedelic therapy, and innovative research, fostering effective and culturally-responsible mental health treatment for underserved communities.

Health
2
Old Skool Cafe

Old Skool Cafe is a faith-based violence prevention program, providing marketable and transferable employment skills to underserved youth. Our social enterprise restaurant is a hub for youth employment and positive change in the lives of…

Youth Development
3
Allies Place Inc
Education
4
The Youth Collective
Recreation & Sports
5
Kulture Klub Collaborative

The mission of Kulture Klub Collaborative is to provide a safe consistent space for youth experiencing homelessness to freely enjoy access to the arts. At KKC we believe that everyone is an artist. We expose, educate, and empower youth…

Arts & Culture
6
Lawndale Art & Performance Center

Lawndale is a multidisciplinary contemporary art center that engages Houston communities with exhibitions and programs that explore the aesthetic, critical, and social issues of our time.See Schedule O for continuation.For over 40 years,…

Arts & Culture
7
Urban Alchemy

To operate workforce programs in areas of civic engagement, urban street cleaning, & reentry services.

Community Improvement
8
The Center for Youth Services Inc

We partner with youth to realize their full potential, by creating opportunities, removing barriers, and promoting racial justice.

Human Services
9
Spark Youth

Spark-Y provides youth with action-oriented labs, in and out of the classroom, that empower young people with STEM education, job experience, and a place to test and grow sustainable solutions in our modern communities.

Human Services
10
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
11
New Pathways for Youth

At New Pathways for Youth, we are building a future where every young person can live their life with joy and purpose, confident in their ability to decide their own path. To make it happen, we are transforming the lives of youth by…

Crime & Legal
12
Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Artyard (Formerly Sprocket Arts). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH GUIDANCE — $150,000 · OtherYOUTH GUIDANCEALL KINGS PROJECT INC — $100,000 · OtherALL KINGS PROJECT INCSPIRITUAL ALLIANCE — $100,000 · OtherSPIRITUAL ALLIANCESPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 · OtherSPIRITUAL ALLIANCE INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE — $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESEHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE REBUILD FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherTHE REBUILD FOUNDATIONCORVINO FOUNDATION — $35,000 · OtherCORVINO FOUNDATIONTHE FARM TEAM — $25,000 · OtherAll Kings Project Inc — $275,000 · HealthAll Kings Project IncLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $25,000 · HealthLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH …INSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRC…Metropolitan Family Services — $50,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family…ALCHEMY INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesALCHEMY INCYouth Guidance — $150,000 · EducationYouth Guida…ARTYARD (FORMERLY SPROCKET ARTS) — $100,000 · PhilanthropyARTYARD (…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII CO…
Other$610,000Health$300,000Human Services$250,000Education$150,000Philanthropy$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAll Kings Project Inc — $275,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetYouth Guidance — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINSIDE-OUTSIDE CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetARTYARD (FORMERLY SPROCKET ARTS) — $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALCHEMY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization N2 Stone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph