Skip to content

· Private foundation

N Jack and Susan P Dilday Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$650
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$33kHealth$12kEducation$11kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$650
Median grant
2
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA LAND TRUST$650
EMINENT GIVING INITIATIVE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE COLLEAGUES: $175 → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $175 → 14%Children Today: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 17 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
37

Total granted

$60k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+51%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MINNESOTA LAND TRUST
    7× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +403%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +82%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $300 · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CC
    CASA COLINA HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • YO
    YMCA OF GREATER LONG BEAC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • CT
    Children Today Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +304%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Boys & Girls Club of Laguna Beach

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as healthy, caring, and responsible adults.

Youth Development
3
Memorial Medical Center Foundation

To cultivate and secure all types of gifts, grants, bequests, and to administer trust and endowment funds and fund development programs, for long beach memorial medical center, a nonprofit public benefit corporation and tax exempt public…

Health
4
Latino Corporate Directors Association

Lcda serves as an advocate and resource to corporate boards, search firms, private equity, and institutional investors interested in gaining access to exceptional latino board talent.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Long Beach State Foundation

The foundation seeks, secures and manages private support for california state university, long beach. (see schedule o)as the philanthropic foundation for the university, all donations in support of our students, faculty, programs and…

Education
7
Latino Corporate Directors Education Foundation

The latino corporate directors education foundation (lcdef) is the affiliated foundation of lcda. together with lcda, the foundation is committed to paving the way for the next generation of us corporate directors. its strategic priority…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Los Angeles Mission College Foundation

The specific purpose for which the los angeles mission college foundation has been established is to advance the college's educational and cultural goals.

—
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Long Beach; the most unlike its peers is Brothers Helpers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAS FLORISTAS INC: $28,222 · EducationLAS FLORISTAS INC+3 more: $250 · EducationTufts UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherTufts UNIVERSITYInternational Medical Corp: $2,100 · OtherInternational Medical CorpCatalina Museum: $1,000 · OtherCASA COLINA HOSPITAL: $1,000 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER LONG BEAC: $1,000 · Other+40 more: $11,165 · Other+40 moreRANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC: $5,425 · HealthRANCHO LOS A…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,430 · HealthNATIONAL MUL…VANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION: $775 · HealthVANGUARD CAN…CANCER FOR COLLEGE: $500 · HealthCANCER FOR C…+1 more: $100 · HealthMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $4,550 · EnvironmentINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,008 · InternationalChildren Today Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $350 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $500 · Youth DevelopmentSTEEL MAGNOLIAS: $100 · Youth Development
Education$28,472Other$26,265Health$8,230Environment$4,550International$3,008Human Services$1,350Youth Development$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAS FLORISTAS INC: $28,222 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetRANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC: $5,425 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $4,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,008 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,430 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren Today Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION: $775 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOR COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LONG BEACH: $489 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $372 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of Long Beach: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHERS HELPERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEEL MAGNOLIAS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAS FLORISTAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Children Today Inc ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds EMINENT GIVING INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ACTION SPORTS KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEAGUES INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA20.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Bess J Hodges Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · The Gordon and Ruth Dougherty Foundation · John W Hancock Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Keesal Young & Logan Charitable Foundation · The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization N Jack and Susan P Dilday Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from N Jack and Susan P Dilday Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to N Jack and Susan P Dilday Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to N Jack and Susan P Dilday Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on N Jack and Susan P Dilday’s filings →

    More from the funding graph