Skip to content
N J and J Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

N J and J Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$465kArts & Culture$452kEnvironment$402kReligion$116kPhilanthropy$82kHealth$46kRecreation & Sports$28kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $248k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$132,720
DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER$62,500
YOUTH HAVEN$53,000
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN$25,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$23,570
ARTIS NAPLES$10,000
SUMMER OF A LIFETIME$10,000
NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,080
WGCU PUBLIC MEDIA$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES$5,000
BAKER SENIOR CENTER$5,000
CONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAH$3,105
Individual grant recipient$3,013
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $100k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $100k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $35k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $30k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $28k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $26k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $25k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $25k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $53k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-13%

Still filing today

47%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $374k · revenue +43%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +561%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • NE
    NAPLES EQUESTRIAN CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
2
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
4
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
5
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
6
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
7
Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Inc

"to help make naples the best place in america to work and live." the greater naples chamber of commerce (the chamber) is a non-profit organization providing services to our members and our community. we strive to fulill the needs of our…

—
8
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
9
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
10
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Richmond Jewish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $307,320 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDADAVID LAWRENCE CENTER: $130,170 · OtherDAVID LAWRENCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $118,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAH: $113,415 · OtherCONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAHTHE HOLOCAUST AND EDUCATION CENTER OF SW FLORIDA: $64,500 · OtherTHE HOLOCAUST AND EDUCATION CENTER OF SW FLORIDAJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $35,000 · OtherNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $32,500 · Other+12 more: $101,928 · Other+12 moreTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $373,500 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN…YOUTH HAVEN INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesARTIS-NAPLES INC: $185,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES I…GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGULFSHORE PLAY…MIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BAL…NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $94,520 · EnvironmentNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $27,500 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $5,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $9,000 · PhilanthropyRICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNO BARRIERS USA: $1,000 · International
Other$902,833Human Services$443,500Arts & Culture$232,500Environment$94,520Health$38,500Education$30,000Philanthropy$14,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $373,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $307,320 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $185,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $94,520 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $67,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO BARRIERS USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NO BARRIERS USA ↗
  • Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…The Bessemer Giving F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization N J and J Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from N J and J Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Naples Community Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on N J and J Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home