Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

N J and J Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$465kArts & Culture$452kEnvironment$402kReligion$116kPhilanthropy$82kHealth$46kRecreation & Sports$28kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $248k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$132,720
DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER$62,500
YOUTH HAVEN$53,000
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN$25,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$23,570
SUMMER OF A LIFETIME$10,000
ARTIS NAPLES$10,000
NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,080
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES$5,000
WGCU PUBLIC MEDIA$5,000
BAKER SENIOR CENTER$5,000
CONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAH$3,105
Individual grant recipient$3,013
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CHICAGO$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $100k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $100k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $35k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $30k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $28k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $26k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $25k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $25k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $53k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-13%

Still filing today

47%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $374k · revenue +43%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +561%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • NE
    NAPLES EQUESTRIAN CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
2
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

4
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

5
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

6
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
7
Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Inc

"to help make naples the best place in america to work and live." the greater naples chamber of commerce (the chamber) is a non-profit organization providing services to our members and our community. we strive to fulill the needs of our…

8
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
9
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
10
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Richmond Jewish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr15%40%20–35yr9%30%35–55yr12%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr9%52%35–55yr12%35%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,024

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $307,320 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDADAVID LAWRENCE CENTER — $130,170 · OtherDAVID LAWRENCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $118,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAH — $113,415 · OtherCONGREGATION OF BETH AHABAHTHE HOLOCAUST AND EDUCATION CENTER OF SW FLORIDA — $64,500 · OtherTHE HOLOCAUST AND EDUCATION CENTER OF SW FLORIDAJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC — $35,000 · OtherNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY — $32,500 · Other+12 more — $101,928 · Other+12 moreTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $373,500 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN…YOUTH HAVEN INC — $67,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC+1 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesARTIS-NAPLES INC — $185,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES I…GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureGULFSHORE PLAY…MIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $22,500 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BAL…NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $94,520 · EnvironmentNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC — $27,500 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $5,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $9,000 · PhilanthropyRICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNO BARRIERS USA — $1,000 · International
Other$902,833Human Services$443,500Arts & Culture$232,500Environment$94,520Health$38,500Education$30,000Philanthropy$14,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $373,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $307,320 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $185,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $94,520 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC — $67,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO BARRIERS USA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC
  • Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
  • Who funds RICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC
  • Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc
  • Who funds NO BARRIERS USA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization N J and J Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc2% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc0% of income from government
  • Naples Community Hospital Inc0% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph